Obama the Socialist - Page 6

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Blitzen on 29 October 2008 - 14:10

So is it about race or not? Ugly say "yes", YR and some others say "no".


by Uglydog on 29 October 2008 - 14:10

And the Stupid Post of the year goes to....Blitzen

Race is an element..for Blacks predominately, Not Whites in this election. Polls evidence that. I think the whites that oppose Obama do so because of his Socialist views & lack of credentials, not his color. Unlike Black supporters of Obama, who dont concern themselves with his views, just his color & keepin it real, as he's a brutha.

Blind, illiterate or just stupid? I just answered your stupid post with a fact. Ill repost it..

 

"Jesus Himself was Not a Jew or (Judean), He was a Galilean or resident of Galilee. (Matthew 26:69; John 7:41).

In Jesus' lifetime, No persons were described as "Jews". That fact is supported by theology, history & science. 

Judea and Galilee were 2 separate states and political entities, as illustrated on the map of Palestine in the time of Jesus.  When Jesus was in Judea, it was not the "homeland" of the ancestors of "Jews". Their ancestors never set a foot in Judea. They existed at that time in Khazaria Asia.  The Judeans of prominence were not of the Tribe of Judah, but of Edomites.  'JEW' originated in the 18th century Abbreviation of the term Judean, without regard to race or religion.'

--Benjamin Freedman, Jewish Historian & Author

 


by Blitzen on 29 October 2008 - 14:10

http://www.godonthe.net/wasblack.htm

I guess we won't know for sure until if and when we get there, will we?

Thanks for the recognition,  Ugly, but I think you've given those same compliments to many others here so I don't feel all that flattered.  Any chance you could one time respond to a thread without name calling?


by Micky D on 29 October 2008 - 14:10

 "showing up for a McCain rally sporting a monkey dressed like Obama"

Ah, ah, ah. don't want to go there, wouldn't be prudent:


Oh, and by the way, the Democrat candidate's MIDDLE NAME is "Hussein".  Why do democrats go bonkers just because someone calls him by his name?  Democrats delighted in referring to Virginia's former Governor and Senator as George FELIX Allen.  I never could figure that one out.  


by Uglydog on 29 October 2008 - 14:10

Blitzen...I have given out that compliment But I nominate yours for 'MVP'  of stupidity or MSA..Most Stupid Award.

Would it make a damn bit of difference if Obama's middle name was DeMarcus or Mohammed? I could give a Rats ass what his parents, middle named him. It has no bearing or relevance.  He is unqualified however, as is John 'Sydney' McCain, whose father betrayed the USS LIBERTY survivors, Israels' attack on a US ship in 1967.

If some of you want to talk race, here you go. Ask & you shall receive.

Crime Rates

Blacks are 7 times more likely than people of other races to commit mur-
der, and 8 times more likely to commit robbery.

When blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly 3 times more likely
than non-blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely to use a knife.

Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly 3 times the white rate, and
Asians commit violent crimes at about 1/4 the white rate.

The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of
the population that is black and Hispanic.

• Between 1980 and 2003 the US incarceration rate more than tripled, from 139 to 482 per 100,000, and the number of prisoners increased from 320,000 to 1.39 million.

• Blacks are 7 times more likely to be in prison than whites. Hispanics are 3 times more likely.

 

Interracial Crime

Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involv-
ing blacks and whites, blacks commit 85% and whites commit 15%.

Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks.
45% of their victims are white, 43 % are black, and 10% are
Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are
black.

Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against
a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.

Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated hate crimes
against whites than vice versa.

Gangs

Only 10% of youth gang members are white.

Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth gangs.
Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times more likely.
Incarceration

Between 1980 and 2003 the US incarceration rate more than tripled, from 139
to 482 per 100,000, and the number of prisoners increased from 320,000 to 1.39
million.

Blacks are 7 times more likely to be in prison than whites. Hispanics are
three times more likely.

The Color of Crime

Race, Crime, and Justice in America
Second, Expanded Edition, 2005

 


by Blitzen on 29 October 2008 - 15:10

You're correct, that's his name. I'm sure if it really were Steve, no one would even know that. The only reason it's even used by the McCain camp  is because it conjores up visions of a person who is an enemy of the state and who is unAmerican. In today's volatile environment, IMO the less that is done to incite the homegrown loonies to do something hideous and unspeakable, the better. The use of his middle  name IMO is used with the intent to create a hostile and fearful atmosphere.  Haven't we had enough of that sort of behavior by now? 


by Uglydog on 29 October 2008 - 15:10

July 15, 2008 - Women, Blacks Give Obama 9 - Point Lead Over McCain, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Men Are Split And Whites Tip To Republican
 




With commanding leads among women and young voters and near unanimous support from black voters, Illinois Sen. Barack Obama has a 50 - 41% lead over Arizona Sen. John McCain, according to a Quinnipiac University national poll of likely voters released today.

BLACK VOTERS  back Sen. Obama 94%, while women support him 55 - 36%. Obama leads 63 - 31% among voters 18 to 34 years old and 48 - 44% among voters 35 to 54, while voters over 55 split with 45 percent for McCain and 44% for Obama.

 

Independent voters split 44 - 44%  the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University poll finds. Sen. McCain has a slight 47 - 44% edge among men voters and a larger 49 - 42% lead among white voters. "

 

 
BLACK VOTERS  back Sen. Obama 94%

Im not a wise man, but 94% might be slightly Rascist, imo.

I agree with your last post. Its fear mongering & Baiting, dirty tactics. We have bigger problems that his or any candidates middle name.

 


by Blitzen on 29 October 2008 - 15:10

Ugly, you never disappoint. That's better, now I feel special.

BTW, going to church this Sunday? Do you tithe? Never mind, none of my business. Carry on...................................Jesus loves  you.


by Micky D on 29 October 2008 - 15:10

 >Haven't we had enough of that sort of behavior by now? <

If BOTH parties subscribed to that thought, yes.  That said, consider the treatment the Democrats, aided by the media, meted out to Senator George Allen, when it looked like he would have been a very strong choice to be the Republican candidate.

George Allen's MOTHER was hounded unmercifully, because she was, wait for it now, OF JEWISH ANCESTRY.  Mrs Allen who was of the generation that saw the Holocaust, tried to hide this fact, because she was afraid.  This was HER choice, HER privacy.  But the press, most of whom are staunch Democrats, made that good woman's life a living hell.  Her son tried desperately to protect her and lost the election for Virginia's senate seat.

Saul Alinsky wrote, in his Rules for Radicals, the following:

[Make opponents live up to their own book of rules. “You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.”]

The Democrats, and a lot of well-meaning people, want both sides to play fair, but until they recognize the despicable acts of Democrats, in their fight for power, you cannot expect civility.


by Uglydog on 29 October 2008 - 15:10

Truth isnt polite, is it Blitzen?

Ive always said that one cant sugarcoat the truth. It is, what it is.

If someone hates the truth or it 'offends' them, thats their problem.






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top