Our Dog Max Shot By Copy - Page 2

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

sueincc

by sueincc on 24 May 2007 - 18:05

Here is a link: http://www.stmarystoday.com/News/Family_dog_dead.html

This is horrible.  There is no excuse & the rat bastard should be stripped of his uniform.  What a flaming turd.  I'm so sorry your dog had to die like this.  I hope you keep the sign up & keep the pressure on. 


animules

by animules on 24 May 2007 - 18:05

I'm so sorry.

Vom Brunhaus

by Vom Brunhaus on 24 May 2007 - 18:05

What ever happened to Mace and Pepper Spray????????????????

by p59teitel on 24 May 2007 - 18:05

"Since you have the proof of rabies vaccination I don't understand why he needs to be tested."

Spin by the police department, so they can say "We were just checking to be absolutely sure the dog was not rabid, to rule out rabies as an explanation for the dog's vicious attack on our kind and gentle peace officer who was just carrying out his lawful duties, and also to ensure that the oficer had not been exposed blah blah blah..."


by gsdlvr2 on 24 May 2007 - 18:05

I think they should check that officer for rabies!!!!!!!!   He is the one who viciously attacked the innocent dog. Yup, I think the officer is rabid. The more I read this the madder I get.Remove his head and send it to the state for evaluation.Get this on every news channel you can. 

by LMH on 24 May 2007 - 19:05

p59--I've been thinking about this all day and since you're an attorney maybe you could provide me with an answer.  Would it be more prudent for Max's owners to seek a lawyer out of the county's jurisdiction for fear that most of them could be compromised or connected with these officials?  I don't know really----but the few times I have been present in court as a spectator, I noticed how chummy they all were with each other. 

MVF

by MVF on 24 May 2007 - 19:05

You do not have to have an attorney.  Represent yourself.  You are less likely to win, but more likely to get the opportunity to have your say.  Judges give more leeway for per se litigants (people wthout lawyers).  It may continue to attract newspaper attention.  It may make the department more critical of this sort of behavior in the future.  The cop in question may pay a public relations price over it.  And you just may win!  My father sued the Bar Association, of all defendants, and without an attorney, and against an army of attorney, he won! Good luck.

MVF

by MVF on 24 May 2007 - 20:05

Long didn't even fully kill Max. He left him dying and not dead.  The story should be told in court...


by seriously on 24 May 2007 - 20:05

Ok,

This is a delicate situation no doubt. I do feel sorry for the dog, because in the dogs eyes they don't recognize cops. The dog only thought a person that shouldn't be there was, and he acted. I'm sorry he was killed.

 Now, with that being said, most of the people on hear have no idea about serving warrants or all that's involved in it. It was a last known address on a wanted person and when the officer was trying to do his job, he was bitten by the animal and reacted. Officers do use deadly force when it is an animal that can do damage, such as a GSD of the size in the pictures. This is covered under deadly force in my state for example, wherein the law says it is authorized to stop seriously bodily injury from occurring.

 Those who say how bout pepper spray, while you have a dog hanging on your leg, need to go fill out an app and show everyone how its done. We do not risk serious muscle damage by going through a force continuum on dogs. It's no different than when we show up on a pit bull run with an aggressive dog that's biting someone for example, we don't yell stop, then baton, then pepper spray, then call for backup, while someone's getting bit. We shoot the dog. People, are more important, than dogs.

 I say that, and believe me, I'm sorry that the dog was killed. I truly am. It's a bad situation, I'm sure they loved their pet very much and I'm sorry it happened. Truly. It's a bad situation for all and I'm sorry it happened.

 

 


by gsdlvr2 on 24 May 2007 - 20:05

Seems to me this should/could fall under Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress.The elements are:1. An act of extreme or outrageous conduct2.Intent to cause severe emotional distress3.Severe emotional distress is suffered4.Defendant is the cause of this distress.
"But for" this officer's actions the injury to You would not have occured.
I am not an attorney but seems to me that it is' foreseeable' that this type of violence to your beloved pet would cause severe emotional distress.Some states also have Reckless Infliction of Emotional Distress.
 INTENT =The desire to inflict severe emotional distress on the plaintiff OR the knowledge with substantial certainty that such distress will result from what the defendant does.
These quotes are from Torts PI litigation book by W. Statsky
 Find your self a good Torts lawyer.   I hope this helps.





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top