For The Masses - Page 9

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Oskar1

by Oskar1 on 19 August 2007 - 19:08

Well, to sum it all up :

Kenny, no one, not even in the threads before was bashing you, your dog or you beeing in the military. No, all tried to educate you, which seems to be a very hard task. You want proof of this & that...... may be I am not as wise as many others on this board, but I sure know one or two things about the GSD and Genetics. Neverless, one does not need to be a rocket scientist to understand, that if you breed bad to bad, the outcome is more likely to be bad than good. Hopefully this was simple enough.

The parents of Ernst should not have been bred with, to beginn with - end of story.

This is exactly the downfall in the USA, anybody can do as pleased and get by with it. What is soo hard about it, to just follow some rules ! Just think about it the other way around : Maybe these rules are there to improve what you are doing, and not just to bug you. Oh, tell me 100% that this or that will be the outcoume..... none of us is God and can predict everything !

Oh, well...... I am ´getting beefed up, and actually thats what I did not want.

And one more thing Kenny, after writing you so many mails, spending so many hours doing research about your dogs, giving you advice, I have a hard time to understand why you refer to me as MR Dresbach, I thought, and still believe, that Ulli will do.

Sincerely

Ulli Dresbach


sueincc

by sueincc on 19 August 2007 - 20:08

Mr. Dresbach:

I agree with you 100% and this is why I cringe when I hear my fellow coutrymen's usual response of "I can do what I want it's a free country".  Have we learned nothing from our mistakes on the American Show Shepherd (I refuse to call it a GSD)?


by Alabamak9 on 19 August 2007 - 20:08

KKR GSD02, Glad to know someone can see throught ninety percent of the proganda on this site from breeders either to promote themselves by tearing others apart. I often wondered how a new person to GSD would see this site thanks for your comments. When I read some of the adviice given out here it makes me cringe,  and it is amazing how most of it is not accurate.  I was reading a post yesterday not to buy a straight backed dog would have hips issues...could go on and on about the mis information and kennel bashing under fake names no need to do.

A dog to his owner is worth millions no matter what the lines or pedigree is the most important thing is how much they love the dog and the enjoyment they bring to our lifes. I have dogs who are titled and some who are not love them all the same. Not everyone fits in to the bad bracket on this site but some  posters we could live without.

I am glad you have a great dog for your family.

 

Marlene


Oskar1

by Oskar1 on 19 August 2007 - 20:08

To allaboutthedawgs,

thank you for your kind words, there are more peopel on this board, that have a greater knowledge than I. But it is sure nice of you to say something like you did, and a little pet on my back is more than wellcome ! Thank you.

To Sueincc,

you are right on.  It sure is good to know, that there are still peopel out there that just wont believe anythind presented to them right away, and try to see the whole picture. Thank you as well.

I will go with Sueincc, this is my last post on this.

Kind Regards Ulli Dresbach


by GoldenElk on 20 August 2007 - 18:08

To the fanged sheep who've accused me of bashing our military:

Not once did I bash the military in what I posted, not even when I mentioned the reality that many soldiers come from working class areas...this is a statistical fact. If anything, I posted an observation counter to what the Republican led sheep of this nation have come to embrace as gospel and the hienas went into attack mode - typical of creatures that can't think for themselves. What? You can't support your military but disagree with the morally corrupt government that will send them into harms way unnecessarilly? What you can't choose not to fight for a corrupt leader? You all rant and rave about the protection of "freedoms" while seceret bills are being passed to take them from you every day, while ironiocally, you slit throats whenever somebody posts opinions counter to "your" ideal. Like typical cattle, you follow the herd and post repeat reply after reply with barely any individuality or variance between the posts. I bet less than 5% who threw me under the bus actually READ my original response to the OP before you took up pitchfork and torch. My own damn fault, what did I expect from the pedigree database LOL!

Kenny - I appreciate your willingness to accept the olive branch, thank you and utmost repsect to you for showing you have the emotional depth to recognize when someone has honestly humbled themselves in making such a gesture.

 

 

*back to the subject of dogs*


BabyEagle4U

by BabyEagle4U on 20 August 2007 - 19:08

Vote Ron Paul !!!!


4pack

by 4pack on 20 August 2007 - 22:08

Rou Paul? LOL now that would be funny


by AKVeronica60 on 20 August 2007 - 23:08

Golden Elk's words of compassion and admiration for the US Military. Here are your words "that did not once bash the US Military":  >>>>I really want to know. Because I won't fall in line with the rest of the cattle and just drop to my knees and suck the virtual dick of someone who proclaims he's a soldier on a messageboard? No I won't. Again, my sympathies for the young people who's patriotism is being prostituted in Iraq, but I'm not going pretend that soldiers in Iraq are fighting to protect America when they are not, I'll leave that to the rest of you fawning apes.<<<<<

Further words from Golden Elk that state her respect for people risking their lives in the service of their country: >>>>You volunteered for the military, that was your choice, no need to rub it anyones face who did not. Most likely you came from a lower income community with others who where joining the military so it seemed like a no brainer . ...Save the martar speach<<<

Golden Elk says: >>> I bet less than 5% who threw me under the bus actually READ my original response to the OP before you took up pitchfork and torch. My own damn fault, what did I expect from the pedigree database LOL!<<<

 


by GoldenElk on 20 August 2007 - 23:08

Well it's the Drama Queen again. Ummmmm, yes. "GoldenElk" typed that. See when people make posts on a messageboard, their login name shows above what they typed (incredible, right?). You seem very obtuse for an older woman, so easilly mystified by the simple machanics of internet software...so much for amassing wisdom as you age. How about you take each of those quotes and break down in critical detail how each one was bashing soldiers, don't hurt yourself though because this type of exercise takes more effort than simply copying and pasting someone elses posts...

by AKVeronica60 on 21 August 2007 - 00:08

Your posts are cognitively below a level requiring critical critique.  Your attempts at sarcasm are below 7th grade level in context and content.  I would say--- "For a more effective argument, please put one of your relatives who attends an elementary school on the keyboard to help you further expound upon your excuses and/or positions on this topic"--- except you might then need to explain to the child your "on your knees" position included in the text copied and pasted from your posts.  I am sure his or her parents would not appreciate the explanation. 

I see no reason to continue to give you the negative attention you apparently crave.  I think I am going to listen to the Don on this one.

Veronica

 






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top