"RETIRED" (?) POLICE OFFICER STARVES/NEGLECTS DOGS - Page 2

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Do right and fear no one on 28 October 2007 - 07:10

I do not know anyone associated with altostland kennels, nor have I ever spoken or written with them, but I have read many posts from them and about them on this database, and IF (and that is a big IF) hkmerc44 is insinuating from the link he or she posted, that altostland is associated with the pictures of the dogs on this thread, then I for one, do not believe it.

Here is a link I just searched and found, from last March, concerning numerous recommendations of altostland kennels and the owner.  Doesn't sound like an animal abuser or neglecter to me.  I think someone is doing a hatchet job, for whatever reason.  When someone is lying, you can usually tell because of all of the details they come up with.  This threads initial posting is very detailed on the alledged abuses, but short on the strong points of who did this to these dogs.

Check out this link and I believe that you will believe as I do, that this is a hatchet job, from someone who has never posted before and probably never will again.

http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/gsd/bulletins_read/102665.html#102684


by spengsd on 28 October 2007 - 16:10

Let me put your mind to rest!! This IS NOT a hatchet job, have you ever been to this Kennel? Have you gone yourself and seen what that Kennel is all about? NO,obviously NOT...Some of the people that was and still is thugs should stand up for these dogs!!~You know who you are..Do not put down a person that had the back bone to do so and hopely has saved these dogs and other people from having to get one of there pups..If the parents look like this, HOw healthy are the pups going to be????

The person could not just lay out all the evidence, than it would be a plus for this Kennel, and a negative for the dogs..Then everyone would know berfore the right people get there and take care of this problem!!

Common since???? That is what is wrong with alot of people, they look at a sight and oh WOW the pictures are great,the dogs look wonderful. Well this is warning someone, that you better have at your Kennel what you are advertising at your Kennel, not hide them..

People STOP and think and Thank the person for doing this..It has cost them alot of money and time to help these dogs give them the respect they deserve..I know there are some Idots that post wrong things but have you ever stop and thought wow this could be true???? Well it is..And again I personality thank you for standing up for these Animals and hope they never have the right to Breed again..I have personality seen the pictures and talked with the Vet,thank God for the Vet also..Someone did something good, Thank Them FOr it..

Debby


trace755

by trace755 on 28 October 2007 - 17:10

Debby, Have you been to the Kennel in question? Do you know the original poster personally? Do you have proof? Has anyone been arrested? Where are the dogs in the photos? Have the local authorities been contacted? Until those questions and more have been answered I don't think anyone should jump to conclusions that can't be back up with facts.

by Do right and fear no one on 28 October 2007 - 17:10

spengsd:  Why would laying out all the evidence be a plus for this kennel and a negative for these dogs?  Dumbest thing I have ever heard.

I already stated that I have never met, taked with or know anyone associated with this kennel, so why ask me?

Why are there already on this database numerous people that have posted how pleased they are with their purchased dogs from this kennel?

You and merc should "lay out all of the evidence" or disappear.  I agree that there are many who make accusations on this web site, without providing the evidence, and I think that is totally wrong.  Don't you?  It is has been done to me, against me, and against others here, and it is wrong to do so, without evidence "layed out", as you put it.

Don't argue with me, convince me, or go away and do your thing with the authorities.

It is obvious from your postings above that the authorities already have this case and animals well in hand.

merc:  you state that those who wish to read the entire case history would be directed to somewhere this could be done.  So, I am wishing to do so.  Please either post the location here or email me at conditionfreak@wmconnect.com, with said info.

If I do not receive said info, I have no choice but to doubt said accusations.  Would I be wrong to do so?

 


by altostland on 28 October 2007 - 17:10

It's always a VERY good idea to ask the "accused" for the truth, and not just take for granted what you read on a forum.  As usual, the truth is far from what is posted.  Thanks to those of you who have already emailed and asked.


by Laramie on 28 October 2007 - 18:10

Judy,  It might be a good idea to explain to these people , in detail, on the messageboard , exactly what happened, as you explained it to me.

 


by altostland on 28 October 2007 - 20:10

Judy -

If ANY of them are interested in the truth, and not too lazy to seek it, they can contact me directly for it.  I will not engage in slinging poop and feeding the trolls on here.  I just got home from two VERY long back-to-back trips to Idaho to rescue my dogs from a very bad situation.  Again, thanks for being objective enough to seek the truth and asking for the other side of the story.



by altostland on 28 October 2007 - 23:10

They, too, are welcome to contact me directly.


by DDR_SDG on 29 October 2007 - 14:10

http://www.ddrlegends.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2086





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top