Out-crossing GSD with other breeds - Page 2

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by zdog on 27 November 2007 - 18:11

regarding "fixing" gsd's I pretty much agree with Jeff.

as for today's designer breeders being mentioned in the same breath as what Max envisioned, well I don't see any comparison.  One man had a vision and a plan, he implemented that plain and created the GSD that has created legends. 

Today we have a group in australia that had a vision and goal, have been working towards "creating" that breed that has predicatable offspring that is both hypoallergenic and a good guide dog.  They haven't yet succeeded. 

That in turn spawned thousands to buy this and that, put a cute name on it, and sell it.  Then the "good" breeders convince you not to buy anything other than an F1 generation (fill in the blank)-poo because those are the only ones that are half way predictable in their traits.  Nobody is trying to consilidate the traits they desire to create a "new" breed that produces consistent offspring.  They're trying to create puppies with cute names to make big bucks.

Now people that are trying to create something new, and really trying, I may not buy it yet, but I wouldn't put them in the same catagory.  From what i've seen, not many breeders have the balls, time, commitment or knowlege to try and "create" something new. and by balls, i mean the stuff that drives someone to make tough decisions regarding their breeding practices and to lay out goals and achieve them.


SchHBabe

by SchHBabe on 27 November 2007 - 19:11

Interesting discussion.  I'm curious about one point... the assertion that cross-bred dogs are unpredictable past the first generation.  Can someone elaborate on this?  What is the scientific basis behind this?  Is it just a generalization?

Another few questions... is it size alone that prevents the GSD from excelling in Ring?  I've seen an 80 lb Mali that was still as quick as lightning desite his bulk.  Is this an anomaly?  Are size and speed always correlated?

Yvette

 


by Jeff Oehlsen on 27 November 2007 - 20:11

Quote: However, your statement about not breeding to the trail winners is contrary to almost everything currently being done and the debate could go from here to there, as it is someowhat radical. This is not radical at all. For me, the dog to breed to needs to be an extreme dog. If you look at what a trial winner is, basically it is a medium drive dog. so on a scale of 1 to 100 somewhere between 40 and 60. Yes, there are dogs that are higher than that, that trial well, but this is an anomole, not the norm. So when I look for a dog to breed to, I want a dog that is.......well, just about fuckin nuts LOL. I do not have any good examples, as I am not dealing with the GSD at all right now. The other problem, is we have no clear definition, or maybe we have hugely varying definitions of what extreme dogs are. In a big trial, I would prefer the dog that is around the 20th to 30th place to start thinking to look. Sometimes they are there because of bad training, but others are there because they are too much dog for that much control. I do not believe that a stud, or a bitch will consistantly (or ever) produce better than themselves, unless there are some things going on, like they are not very good to begin with, a genetic anomoly that passes genes from forebearers, ect, basically all things that are not the general rule of thumb. Yes, most people think that the GSD is going in the shitter, but then they breed the same way, and expect different results......I think that is the definition of insanity. LOL I know that I have seen some GSD's lately with Mal characteristics phenotypically, and I do not like this. One of the things that I see in GSD's that I do not see in Mals is character. Mals are more me me me, where the GSD will work above his capabilities because you ask him to. I never want to see me me me in the GSD. I would love to see more character in the Mals. Don't ask me how to fix that, I am not qualified YET to do so. : ) The GSD is never gonna excel in any one thing. Most I see in Sch are just polished turds, and then people breed to these turds, and have trouble with having to build drive and BS like that. If you have to build drive, the dog is a shitter. Sorry, just my opinion. I have had dogs that have to be built up, have trained dogs that have to be built up, and it is just getting to be too much. Time to raise the bar.

by Puputz on 27 November 2007 - 20:11

"I know that I have seen some GSD's lately with Mal characteristics phenotypically, and I do not like this. One of the things that I see in GSD's that I do not see in Mals is character. Mals are more me me me, where the GSD will work above his capabilities because you ask him to. I never want to see me me me in the GSD. I would love to see more character in the Mals. "

Yes, thank you, Jeff. You really shouldn't judge a GSD by Mal standards. Too many people think that just because their dog chases a ball it has "extreme" prey drive, and just because their dog growls at them for every little thing it's got "fight drive", and just because a GSD won't out and looks slow on the Schutzhund field it's a crapper. And too many people wouldn't know "power" and "intensity" if it hit them in the face.


by Get A Real Dog on 27 November 2007 - 20:11

Ok I'll bite...........

So lets say I have my ideal GSD. Say I inbreed that dog for three generations (father/daughter or vice versa) You can't consoildate and know exactly what the gene pool is, both goog and bad, without inbreeding. So say I am lucky enough to produce from this gene pool good temperment, good hips and elbows in 75% of the prodgeny.

Now say I find a Mal who is linebred on Jorie. Jorie was the 1992 Belgian Ring Champion who I know for a fact was 1/2 GSD. Belgian ring has the jumps, enviornmental stress, and judges grips very hard. So i breed this Mal to my inbred GSD.

Then I take that and breed to a French line GSD who is from generations of French and/or Mondio ring. Big jumps and enviormental stress. I breed several females to a great producer from these lines and breed the following progeny back to "pure" GSD of great quality, who are within the "standard".

Do you think I would improve the physical soundness and ability, and environmental stability of my breeding program?

Do you think I would not have animals who look like, act like, and produce GSD's?


by Jeff Oehlsen on 27 November 2007 - 21:11

Lets say you do all the above, and barring the genetic crap that is going to surface due to the GSD having so many recessives, and the time it takes to get clear of it, would adding that Malx in really make a difference??? Plus, what if all that was from the Malx passed was the lack of character, and me me me mentality, and this was prominent in what you were producing???? If you start with sound dogs, then you will have to probably go a bit longer to get them back to where they can do the jumps, as GSD's seem to have lost that capability. I see no reason to go to the Mal in the first place. There is good breeding stock out there, and as long as you keep the bar high........

by DDRshep on 28 November 2007 - 01:11

Belschik von Eicken-Bruche-small, fast, hard hitting, GSD character, produced all of the above too

It seems most people who like Mals like them because they are potentially faster and more athletic than most GSDs. Well, there are GSDs like Belschik who have those traits. You don't need a Mal to have drives, there are lots of GSDs with more than enough drive these days. So adding in Mals adds nothing that you can't get by breeding the right type of GSD. The GSD is such a popular and varied breed that if you search hard enough, you'll always find what you're looking for. Even a non-shedding GSD-I have one of those! LOL


by DDRshep on 28 November 2007 - 01:11

sorry for the font in the above post, couldn't figure out how to correct it


by Get A Real Dog on 28 November 2007 - 02:11

Yes Belschik was a very nice dog. small, fast, agile. The question I have is would he be able to physically do ring sport jumps throughout his career? I ask this because alot of the dogs I have seen looking at pedigrees were OFA fair or a-fast normal and who knows how many didn't pass. What about elbows?

I have seen several dogs from Belshick. They were fast and they were agile. They also carried aggression. the problem was it was nervy aggression. I have seen a very, very nice male that is two off of Belschik. He however was not small, not fast, and not agile. He was a bruiser.


by DDRshep on 28 November 2007 - 03:11

>They were fast and they were agile. They also carried aggression. the problem was it was nervy aggression.

Sounds like a Mal






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top