I didn't know how widespread bite training IS in the U.S.! - Page 6

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

4pack

by 4pack on 18 December 2007 - 23:12

Why don't you go hit enter instead of tab a few more times for good measure! LMAO

by von symphoni on 18 December 2007 - 23:12

why dont you use a dipthong instead of a tilde you overgrown umlaut........ are we getting off track here?

4pack

by 4pack on 18 December 2007 - 23:12

Purposly off track, this thread is stick a fork in it done! Diddles himself won't answer legit questions, just runs off with his tail tucked. Someone must have passed gas.

by Do right and fear no one on 18 December 2007 - 23:12

I would continue this fun with you gals but it is hopeless. You hear and read what you want to hear and read. Not what is said or written. I started out my posting about the statistics site with these words: "here is a link to dog bite statistics compiled by one, so called expert" and I further said: "As indicated by another above, statistics can used used for and against just about any stand." and also wrote: "Yep, statistics can jump up and bite you on the arse, if you're not careful". All in the same posting. But, as usual, with you pod dwellers, you just can't seem to comprehend more than one or two sentences at a time. I was strengthening the point that another made (although he backed off a little when he thought you were displeased) that statistics can be twisted to fit just about any point of view. When someone cites a person or site that does not conform with your ideas, it is poo-poo'd as "who the hell is this or that person" (remember the thread about the wolf blood in the GSD?), but when ya'll cite a reference, it is gospel. Additionally, I was being sarcastic about starting a thread concerning feeding live animals to dogs, for food and prey drive. I guess it zinged right over your pod dwelling heads. I used it because of a recent thread (which I might have been the initiator of, but I have not looked it up because it ain't that important) concerning dogs that get ahold of live chickens or whatever, and kill them. If memory serves me correctly, I asked if this type of thing happened, would anyone just go ahead and let the dogs eat the dead animal, now that the damage was done. I was interested in the responses then as my dog got one of the neighbors chickens and was eating it when I took it away from her (or him, I don't remember which dog it was now). One or more of the respondents on that thread recounted similar episodes and some thought it was funny or not a big deal. I also did not and do not think that it is a big deal now. Shit happens. I would never do it intentionally, but if an accident happens with a chicken or a rabbit, then it happens. That is nature. My statmeent above was meant to lighten this posting which has been beaten to death by me and ya'll. But, as usual, you denegerated to your jerk, vulgar selfs. Trying to debate something with you gals is like trying to train a bumble bee to "heal". Hard, dangerous and just plain not worth it. By the way, when you all are in that pod, who does the dishes?

4pack

by 4pack on 19 December 2007 - 00:12

I was never "displeased" with anyones comments on this thread. I have to laugh because not much zings over my head, especially if it contains sarcasim. My worries were for the newbies who don't get the joke. Debates are supposed to feel competative. I never take them too seriously so I don't get butt hurt like you. I'm not trying to "win", just telling my side. I do the dishes. I'm the clean freak of the podhold.

by von symphoni on 19 December 2007 - 00:12

do i get to be in a pod? I want a pod darnit!!!

4pack

by 4pack on 19 December 2007 - 00:12

10% down VS. 10% down and hope your credit score is over 710. Hows that debt to income ratio right about now? I might be able to find you a nice little pod on the sunny side of the vine.

sueincc

by sueincc on 19 December 2007 - 03:12

VS, you are in like flynn. doreacharound you are a moron.

sueincc

by sueincc on 19 December 2007 - 03:12

DoRight/Jasw1701 whatever you are calling yourself, every time you say something particularly heinous like your bullshit about the live prey (which you have said more than once) or when ever you misspell words or use them incorrectly you try to pawn it off as "you did it on purpose" or "you were only kidding" or "you were being sarcastic". Give us a break, we see right through your lies, bullshit & excuses.

allaboutthedawgs

by allaboutthedawgs on 19 December 2007 - 04:12

VS-I never even WANTED that *+*&% 4pack in the pod! She weaseled her way in and now she's such a control freak! I can't take it, I tell you! "Dawgs, wipe your feet on the husk before you come in!" "Dawgs, take out the trash before we get more ladybugs!" "Dawgs, the toilet paper roll feeds AWAY from the stem not TOWARD the stem!" If all you do is correct my typing skills I think you would be a much better poddie. Sue don't care as long as she gets the best parking space. 4pack-you're either down the vine or you have to share your side of the pod with VS. DoYouWantToInvestInTheBrooklynnBridgeOrPhonyCD-you just do such a better job of showing yourself for the ignorant, lowbrow moron you are than any of us really could. It's great. You keep trying to cover with that whole, "Gee whiz it was just sarcasm" routine. That's the problem with the stupid. They never realize they are, thus, they believe no one else does either. Now, for some reason, you seem hesitant to talk about that BSP grandpup that has the killer drive. Hey wait a minute. You said one chicken. But in your previous load of shit you said the killer dog killed with much more intensity than the other two? So, that would be a least three chickens for comparative purposes??? Do you want to alter your story again, Wallis? Jeepers! Wouldn't the defense attorneys out there have a field day with Officer Walley's propensity to manufacture evidence? Doesn't instill a lot of faith in the judicial system when self proclaimed (but unsubstantiated) cops make up shit on such a routine basis. Oh, wait you did give the "department phone number" for verification didn't you. It was the number for a cement company, right? Still waiting for the name of that BSP grandpup. Tic. Toc. Tic. Toc.





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top