2008 USA Sieger Show - Page 4

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by eichenluft on 20 April 2008 - 08:04

Because, the Universal Sieger title CAN be bought - it's been proven every year in the past few at least - and it's so much easier that way!  And just as prestigious as earning it yourself (you and your dog)!  (??)  Right?

 

molly


by Blitzen on 20 April 2008 - 13:04

Oh puleeze, videos don't lie, everyone saw what happened and most reading this will obviously not allow it to be explained away or condoned again by anyone.  Do you think we are stupid? Trying to justify the poor performances of most of the dogs on these videos is the epitome of arrogance. Kudos to those of you who will not swallow the poison pill  one more time. This might be the last show you ever get to see on video uncensored.

Keep lowering the bar and soon all some dogs will need to do is to be present in the ring to pass the protection with a pronounced. They will all be from the same 4 or 5 kennels or bred in Germany. But maybe that's the goal?

Take back your sport.


DeesWolf

by DeesWolf on 20 April 2008 - 13:04

Blitzen! thank you! that might be my knew bumper sticker "Take back your sport"!!!

I am amazed that ANYONE would try to explain or excuse the travesty that occurred at the SS.

Any dog that has been given the HONOR of EXCELLENT SELECT at a sieger show should have been able to Heel to the attack out of the blind, not come off the sleeve on a stick hit, or a threat of a stick hit, and the dog should OUT cleanly!  There was a lack of courage at that performance test, just like there has been in years past. I am not just talking about the lack of courage in the dogs presented, I am talking a lack of courage on the part of the UScA officials! 

Excellent Select is NO LONGER AN HONOR. It is a joke!  Sadly, the whole world is laughing at what WE as a membership of UScA have allowed. It is disgusting!

 


steve1

by steve1 on 20 April 2008 - 14:04

As a complete oursider to your system of training and titling Dogs, can you tell me where the Dogs will come from that will be competing for the USA in this years world Schutzund Championships

What is there Qualifications regarding Trials this year to pick such a team. and have the trials finished or partly so

Ours over here will be decided this coming Sunday, it is the Final Selection trial of Three in Belgium for the forth coming World Championship in the USA

Watch out for ZENDER and  NENA thats my first two to go forwards to the W.C inthe USA 

Steve


Mystere

by Mystere on 20 April 2008 - 14:04

Randy? Please, let's just be honest. Has Ronaldo tracked more than 3 times since being titled to Sch 3 ...how many years ago? Done any obedience routines, especially retrieving over the jump and wall? Ever done a send out? Now, when, if ever, was the last blind search? Escape? Full-field courage test? Thought so. So, now, with all the training that was not done since geting a Sch 3 years ago, one is supposed to believe that anyone honestly intends to (1) train and enter a USA club trial with a real chance of earning a 270. And (2) enter one of the only 2-3 regionals left for this year ? Those regionals, btw, are the Mid-East regional in August, the Pacific Northwest regional in June, and there may be one (or 2) others, but I don't think so. (Obviously, that information is on the USA website and I am sure you have checked it). Bottom-line, one must wonder if the reality has already been checked regarding brinigng a non-training dog up to snuff for a regional in under 4 months with a 270 score in a region ( Mid-east) known for (1) having a large Sch 3 entry of strong, top-competing dogs, (2) having some of the strongest helpers in the country, and (3) is being held this year in the hottest, most humid time of the yearg or, taking same dog to a much smaller (usually only 3-6 Sch 3 entries) in an area known for good tracking alll year in just over 2 months. I am willing to bet that this has already all been considered and being held in reserve as yet another excuse down the line. :-) The Universal Sieger declaration is a good schtick for marketing. I truly hope that is not the case in this instance. But, your response does not really forestall that conclusion. I think the Universal Sieger race is Juneau, Ule and Ulrich. I would love to see a VA in the running for it, but I just don't believe in the Easter Bunny anymore. By the way, the whine about dogs having a 5 point advantage is garbage, when YOU dog is the VA with a built-in point advantage from that, which you well know. :-) It is also utter rot, as you know full well that the working line dog is an import with a SG show rating, the lone female in the running has a "mere" "V" ratin at the show, so her 5 points for being US bred kinda ends in a draw, huh? You do know that she also must enter a USA trial for a 270 score and participate in one of the remaining regionals?

Mystere

by Mystere on 20 April 2008 - 14:04

Steve1 The requirements for the USA National Championship are (1) a qualifying score of 270 pts. or more at a USA-sanctioned trial and (2) participation in a USA Regional Championship. Therer are 8 regions and the NW, SW, Southeast, South Central, Mid Central (?) Have had theirs already. The last regional is usually Mid East in September, but it is at the end of August this year. With the WUSV Championship being held in the US in October, some schedules were pushed up. ...one can, of course, get both qualifying requirements done by searning a 270 at a regional championship and some do so.

Dog1

by Dog1 on 20 April 2008 - 14:04

Wow, I can't believe Molly as a menber and representative of the UScA organization that's hosting not only the Nationals (which is the event that will determine the Universal Sieger) and the World Schutzhund Championship would go on an International forum and suggest the UScA organization is corrupt and placings can be bought It just blows me away. That's all I say on that subject.

 

Louise. No one doubts your experience. I will not be trialing my dog myself because he's competing against the same top trainer and handler that you paid to title your dog. As I said before, this is a National event, he deserves better than me. It's about the dog.

 

Hodie,

I know you are passionate about your dogs and your female had a super performance in Carson City. I'm not convinced SG17 and V29 are not regarded as high places at the German Sieger show. There are many breeders around the world that would be thrilled to make such a place. I'm not sure I agree with your statement that most of the VA dogs at this years UScA sieger show would not make top 50 in Germany when actually 'most of those that were shown there have. Bear in mind progeny has an impact on the VA positions too. So on many respectswith regard to conformation events, let's agree to disagree.


by Blitzen on 20 April 2008 - 14:04

I'd be honored, Deeswolf. My other suggestion would be "You Can't Fix Stupid" . Too harsh?


by hodie on 20 April 2008 - 15:04

I don't want to turn this into a Randy smashing, but I AM curious Randy as to whether you have titled a dog and if so, how long it took you? Where was the trial and who was the judge? As we all know, many of the dogs being shown have been titled quickly and trained poorly to boot (because quick training is NOT good training).  If this was the case with any dog vying for Universal Sieger, despite the fact that he must compete to qualify (and events are running out), I don't think the dog has a prayer. I know how long it takes to bring even a really well trained dog back up to snuff after a long layoff. Yes, this Universal Sieger is a good marketing ploy and sadly, there are plenty of uninformed people who will buy it. So often, they only want a dog who looks nice at their side. And like too many involved in the breed, to hell with whether the dog really is a good representative of the breed.

As for Louise, her credentials speak for themselves. One need not agree with her all the time, or even like her, but one cannot say she has not walked the walk on many a street. She has done more with her dogs than most here ever will accomplish. And yes, she promotes her dogs but no less so than many whose dogs are not particularly deserving of promotion. She is older. Randy, you are what age? Mid 40s? Early 50s? Why can't you get out there and struggle learning to handle and train for trialwork? Because you choose not to do so and would rather buy your way along. That is your choice and I do not even begrudge you or anyone that. But don't try to tell us the baloney you wrote above and justify poor work.

I am 61 and have a torn ankle tendon and am in serious and constant pain. But by golly, I am running my business AND training my dogs (and several others) and yes, it is costing me a fortune to bring in competent helpers. But without this, why even bother doing any of it? Anyone with enough money can buy anything, including a good looking dog. At least, if one wants to be taken seriously, have the smarts to hire the best trainers and train all the time so when you are thinking of declaring for Universal Sieger we are not all spilling our Gatorade as we laugh at reading that.

 


by hodie on 20 April 2008 - 15:04

Again, this is not about showlines vs working lines, at least for me. I have some excellent show line dogs, and I have some excellent working line dogs. It is about trying to pull the wool over the eyes (both others and some people do it to themselves when they justify piss poor work like has been done here), a pervasive lack of integrity in the GSD world, and trying to sell green cheese from the moon to people who don't know better. For those who do know better, we need to continue to speak out and speak up loudly. Even still, I doubt that anything will change. The organization itself is set up so that there is no vote for one person. Until everyone has a voice, and the few that think they speak for the majority are shown that they do not, it is hopeless.

  Instead of trying to justify what went on at this event (again), why don't you complain about the issues that are REAL as mentioned in a post above? I already know the answer to that. It is because it is not important  because the charade can continue as is.......but many are not buying it and we will try for the day when fewer and fewer will buy "it" and what comes out of it.





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top