This is a placeholder text
Group text
by luvdemdogs on 07 June 2009 - 02:06
My parasites are now going to university. Come to think of it - in a way, they're still parasites, LOL!
By the way, like suincc, most of my working day is involved in helping these former parasites - and often time - without pay - my dedication to making the lives of former parasites better has been a core part of my live for over 20 years - that's often why I am not as involved in my dogs as some of the other posters here - the former parasites take precedence, LOL! Sso take a f^&king pill, already - goddamn unthinking, reactionary self righteous morons. The level of reactionary idiocy here is would be unbelievable if it weren't so pathetically predictable.
by RatPackKing on 07 June 2009 - 02:06
The first sign of arguement is name calling,,,,,You take the 1rst prize!!!
RPK
by BabyEagle4U on 07 June 2009 - 02:06
YOU are talking about a little human being, ment to be's, wannabe's, life, purpose, meaning by God. Not some blood-sucking leech or inconvience. Where do you people come from ?
.. can I have permission to forward this thread ?
by RatPackKing on 07 June 2009 - 02:06
by luvdemdogs on 07 June 2009 - 02:06
at any rate, in one sense, I realize that it's much more fun to simply chuckle at the morons than try to enlighten them. LOL!
by RatPackKing on 07 June 2009 - 02:06
"The word "parasite" is defined both medically and socially as an organism which lives in and takes its nourishment from another organism".
Sounds like socialism.............LMAO!!!!!!
RPK...........AHAHAHAHAHAH
by sueincc on 07 June 2009 - 03:06
BabyEagle feel free to send anything here to where ever you want, though I have no clue what you think you will accomplish. How dare you call a parasite a blood sucking inconvience! lol,lol
by RatPackKing on 07 June 2009 - 03:06
by luvdemdogs on 07 June 2009 - 03:06
this just keeps getting funnier, LOL!
by RatPackKing on 07 June 2009 - 03:06
The more capitalist the system is, the higher the rate of economic growth will be, the more wealth that will be created, the lower the jobless rate will be, the less taxes you'll pay, and the more people have to rely on themselves. The more socialist our system becomes, the lower our rate of growth will be, the higher the jobless rate will be, the less wealth will be created, the more taxes you'll pay, and the more we'll have to rely on government. On the other hand, there will be more ups and downs in a captitalistic system while we'll have a long, slow, steady slide into economic mediocrity under socialism.
Which of those options sounds more attractive? If you're a conservative, a logical person, or for that matter, one of our Founding Fathers who may be reading from beyond-the-grave, you'll pick the capitalistic system. If you're a liberal, ne'er-do-well who just likes leaching off of other people, or a power hungry government worker, you'll pick the socialist system.
RPK
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top