This is a placeholder text
Group text
by DebiSue on 19 July 2009 - 19:07
Let me say it slowly so that you might understand. We are supporting our troops. The same men and women who protect your right to free speech.
Take your anit-American axe to grind to another post. Or better yet.... take your unhappy ass to some other country where you can live happily ever after. There! Have I made myself clear?
Take your anit-American axe to grind to another post. Or better yet.... take your unhappy ass to some other country where you can live happily ever after. There! Have I made myself clear?
by Uglydog on 19 July 2009 - 19:07
Soldiers dont protect my 'rights.'
The war for Americas' Freedoms was fought over 200 years ago, not in Iraq, Afganistan or Pakistan. On Lies.
US Soldiers confiscated citizens' arms in New Orleans in Katrina, and many thugs will do the same here.
'Go to another country' because I dont support those that 'follow orders' How can I not support the war by supporting the troops? Troops that wage war for IsraHell and Oil companies.
Or worse, Pimp the war like a parrot, such as you do?
Tell me why you support Occupation?
Do you know the cost of this? Do you know it is bankrupting us?
Do you know it has resulted in 5 Million Orphans? Blood washes slowly, doesnt it? Some need to learn the hard way. You will soon enough.
Occupation's Toll: 5 Million Iraqi Children Orphaned
By AlterNet Staff
12/18/2007
Iraq's anti-corruption board revealed on that there were 5 million Iraqi orphans as reported by official government statistics, urging the government and NGOs to be in constant contact with Iraq's parentless children.
" Iraqi is an oil-rich country and it is not acceptable that its orphans remain groaning in this tragedy," anti-corruption board chief, Moussa Faraj, said.
The war for Americas' Freedoms was fought over 200 years ago, not in Iraq, Afganistan or Pakistan. On Lies.
US Soldiers confiscated citizens' arms in New Orleans in Katrina, and many thugs will do the same here.
'Go to another country' because I dont support those that 'follow orders' How can I not support the war by supporting the troops? Troops that wage war for IsraHell and Oil companies.
Or worse, Pimp the war like a parrot, such as you do?
Tell me why you support Occupation?
Do you know the cost of this? Do you know it is bankrupting us?
Do you know it has resulted in 5 Million Orphans? Blood washes slowly, doesnt it? Some need to learn the hard way. You will soon enough.
Occupation's Toll: 5 Million Iraqi Children Orphaned
By AlterNet Staff
12/18/2007
Iraq's anti-corruption board revealed on that there were 5 million Iraqi orphans as reported by official government statistics, urging the government and NGOs to be in constant contact with Iraq's parentless children.
" Iraqi is an oil-rich country and it is not acceptable that its orphans remain groaning in this tragedy," anti-corruption board chief, Moussa Faraj, said.
by MaggieMae on 19 July 2009 - 20:07
Uglydog -- You are full of SHIT !! Your constant "ranting" is a big turn-off. Go somewhere else to live; I can guarantee you that no other people/country would put up with your Bullshit mouth.
I cannot imagine that Ron Paul is behind this kind of thinking....actually you hurt the image of Ron Paul. You have BIG "issues" and should seek professional help. I do get very mad and sickened when our Soldiers die and are maimed for anyone such as YOU !!
by DebiSue on 19 July 2009 - 20:07
So, Ugly,
When are you going to run for office and make a change? Hmmmm? Sitting around throwing quotes doesn't make it go away. Do something about it.
I support our men and women, the troops who protect me. I never said I supported any war, any occupation and trust me, no one is taking my gun.
The wars are always political. You get yourself elected and fix it up for us, ok? Then we'll see if I care what you yourself, not your quotes have to say.
If you are not interested in supporting our troops, I think Fred Phelps is recruiting.
When are you going to run for office and make a change? Hmmmm? Sitting around throwing quotes doesn't make it go away. Do something about it.
I support our men and women, the troops who protect me. I never said I supported any war, any occupation and trust me, no one is taking my gun.
The wars are always political. You get yourself elected and fix it up for us, ok? Then we'll see if I care what you yourself, not your quotes have to say.
If you are not interested in supporting our troops, I think Fred Phelps is recruiting.
by Jessie James on 19 July 2009 - 22:07
OK here's my take If you are so unhappy with the way America is then move. Plain and simple. Go to Mexico or Japan. After you've lived there for awhile then I think you'll appreciate the Freedom our Soldiers fight for. It's the Soldiers who are keeping us free so that You and I have the freedom to express our oppinons. It's not about gay or straight, it's about right and wrong! How would you feel if your loved one dies and on the way to the grave you have people shouting hate. It's just wrong to stand there and protest a soldier who died so that these A'holes have the freedom to stand there so that WE have the freedom to to sit here and speak our minds freely. If you don't like it don't read it if you dont like the way America is then pack your stuff and get out. Are there things we can change yeah there are but nothing is ever gonna change if all you do is hate and complain. Learn to accecpt people the way they are. Who are we to judge?
by raymond on 19 July 2009 - 23:07
Americas problem lies with people like you jessie! When things in america are not right it is the right of americans to correct those wrongs! That is my right spelled out in the constitution! It is about gay and straight! Homosexuality is an abomination 'deviation from normal right sexual practices! It is not a matter of opinion but a matter of fact! period! It is not about your opinion but about right verses wrong! You are americas biggest problemand you express the biggest no excuse when you say who are we to judge!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!so we celebrate someones death even though they were guilty of murder!!!!!!!!!!Oh so you being a fine example of intolerance when you say if you do not like the way we run america move to mexico or japan. Well JJ why don't you get out of america and allow decent people to try to fix it. I will not accept a person who is guilty of child molestation because it is their sexual preference as protected by the law! I will not accept a homosexual who blatantly spreads sexual diseases with all their partners and cause my insurance rates to explode and the schools teaching that it is ok!NO iS IT WRONG TO PROTEST THAT A SOLDIER WENT TO WAR AND DIED FOR NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!! i AM A VIET NAM VETERAN AND i TELL YOU ALL THOSE WHO DIED DIED FOR NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!! iS vIET NAM FREE AND LIVING THE AMERICAN WAY??????? no SO 50THOUSAND SOLDIERS DIED FRO NOTHING BUT TO FURTHER THE POLITICAL AMBITIONS OF A FEW VAMPIRES. YOU PEOPLE MAKE MY ASS SORE FOR YOU KNOW ABSOLUTLY NOTHING ABOUT WHAT GOES ONE IN THIS WORLD BUT WHAT CNBC TELLS YOU!
by Uglydog on 20 July 2009 - 00:07
War Is A Racket
Marine General, Congressional Medal of Honor recipient Smedley Butler
http://www.iamthewitness.com/books/Smedley.Darlington.Butler/War.Is.A.Racket.htm
'WAR is a racket. It always has been.
It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.
A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small "inside" group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.
In the World War [I] a mere handful garnered the profits of the conflict. At least 21,000 new millionaires and billionaires were made in the United States during the World War. That many admitted their huge blood gains in their income tax returns. How many other war millionaires falsified their tax returns no one knows.
Out of war nations acquire additional territory, if they are victorious. They just take it. This newly acquired territory promptly is exploited by the few — the selfsame few who wrung dollars out of blood in the war. The general public shoulders the bill.
And what is this bill?
This bill renders a horrible accounting. Newly placed gravestones. Mangled bodies. Shattered minds. Broken hearts and homes. Economic instability. Depression and all its attendant miseries. Back-breaking taxation for generations and generations.
The World War, rather our brief participation in it, has cost the United States some $52,000,000,000. Figure it out. And we haven’t paid the debt yet.
And very little, if anything, has been accomplished to assure us that the World War was really the war to end all wars.
Yes, we have had disarmament conferences and limitations of arms conferences. They don’t mean a thing. One has just failed; the results of another have been nullified. We send our professional soldiers and our sailors and our politicians and our diplomats to these conferences. And what happens?
The professional soldiers and sailors don’t want to disarm. No admiral wants to be without a ship. No general wants to be without a command. Both mean men without jobs. They are not for disarmament. They cannot be for limitations of arms. And at all these conferences, lurking in the background but all-powerful, just the same, are the sinister agents of those who profit by war. They see to it that these conferences do not disarm or seriously limit armaments.
The chief aim of any power at any of these conferences has not been to achieve disarmament to prevent war but rather to get more armament for itself and less for any potential foe.
There is only one way to disarm with any semblance of practicability. That is for all nations to get together and scrap every ship, every gun, every rifle, every tank, every war plane. Even this, if it were possible, would not be enough.
The next war, according to experts, will be fought not with battleships, not by artillery, not with rifles and not with machine guns. It will be fought with deadly chemicals and gases.
Secretly each nation is studying and perfecting newer and ghastlier means of annihilating its foes wholesale. Yes, ships will continue to be built, for the shipbuilders must make their profits. And guns still will be manufactured and powder and rifles will be made, for the munitions makers must make their huge profits. And the soldiers, of course, must wear uniforms, for the manufacturer must make their war profits too.
Marine General, Congressional Medal of Honor recipient Smedley Butler
http://www.iamthewitness.com/books/Smedley.Darlington.Butler/War.Is.A.Racket.htm
'WAR is a racket. It always has been.
It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.
A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small "inside" group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.
In the World War [I] a mere handful garnered the profits of the conflict. At least 21,000 new millionaires and billionaires were made in the United States during the World War. That many admitted their huge blood gains in their income tax returns. How many other war millionaires falsified their tax returns no one knows.
Out of war nations acquire additional territory, if they are victorious. They just take it. This newly acquired territory promptly is exploited by the few — the selfsame few who wrung dollars out of blood in the war. The general public shoulders the bill.
And what is this bill?
This bill renders a horrible accounting. Newly placed gravestones. Mangled bodies. Shattered minds. Broken hearts and homes. Economic instability. Depression and all its attendant miseries. Back-breaking taxation for generations and generations.
The World War, rather our brief participation in it, has cost the United States some $52,000,000,000. Figure it out. And we haven’t paid the debt yet.
And very little, if anything, has been accomplished to assure us that the World War was really the war to end all wars.
Yes, we have had disarmament conferences and limitations of arms conferences. They don’t mean a thing. One has just failed; the results of another have been nullified. We send our professional soldiers and our sailors and our politicians and our diplomats to these conferences. And what happens?
The professional soldiers and sailors don’t want to disarm. No admiral wants to be without a ship. No general wants to be without a command. Both mean men without jobs. They are not for disarmament. They cannot be for limitations of arms. And at all these conferences, lurking in the background but all-powerful, just the same, are the sinister agents of those who profit by war. They see to it that these conferences do not disarm or seriously limit armaments.
The chief aim of any power at any of these conferences has not been to achieve disarmament to prevent war but rather to get more armament for itself and less for any potential foe.
There is only one way to disarm with any semblance of practicability. That is for all nations to get together and scrap every ship, every gun, every rifle, every tank, every war plane. Even this, if it were possible, would not be enough.
The next war, according to experts, will be fought not with battleships, not by artillery, not with rifles and not with machine guns. It will be fought with deadly chemicals and gases.
Secretly each nation is studying and perfecting newer and ghastlier means of annihilating its foes wholesale. Yes, ships will continue to be built, for the shipbuilders must make their profits. And guns still will be manufactured and powder and rifles will be made, for the munitions makers must make their huge profits. And the soldiers, of course, must wear uniforms, for the manufacturer must make their war profits too.
by MaggieMae on 20 July 2009 - 01:07
Uglydog - Have you ever been in the Military? So, Mr. Know-it-all, what should the U.S. have done after 9-11? Tell me your BIG plan/solution. Yes, I know 9-11 terrorists were Saudi, so don't start that B.S. w/me. I don't think you are "playing with a full deck."
by raymond on 20 July 2009 - 02:07
Maggie I trust you do not believe that the twin towers could have possibly been toppled by an airliner crashing into it! Come on now just use some good ole common sense! All the perpertrators were saudi and we invade two countries other than saudi arabia?Oh please wake up and smell the coffee!!!!!! And the most powerfull country on the planet can not find one man?? Oh please I hope you are smarter than that!!! Weapon of mass destruction in Iraq and busch can't find the gases the united states furnished him with to fight Iran! God Almight help these poor STUPID SHEEP!!!911 was engineered by our country leaders to use as a prerequiste to invade two OIL RICH COUNTRIES!!!!!!!!! AFGANISTAN HAS THE PIPELINES AND POPPIES FOR WORLD DISTRIBUTION!!!!!!!!!!!!! OF RUSSIAN OIL AND AFGAN JUNK! Holy smoke people wake up and see the truth!!!! Irag and afganistan allowed the positioning of us troops in strategic oil rich areas The twin towers could not have fallen as they did unless the lower floors collapsed in a pre sequenced explosion. My God girl the third building was never hit with an airliner yet it collapsed at free fall speed! All of the steeel was certified to sustain far more heat than was at the towers fire!
by MaggieMae on 20 July 2009 - 02:07
Ok Raymond -- your post above is the final straw -- I think you are F'n Crazy. I wish no further conversation w/ you. You are a looney-toon if you believe we attacked our own Country. FOOL !! AMF
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top
