GSD fraud? - Page 10

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

MaggieMae

by MaggieMae on 04 May 2010 - 14:05

Michael -- my heart/love is for the GSD.   That does not mean that I cannot appreciate, admire another type of dog.   Tina is not breeding GSD's and she does not claim her Shiloh's are GSD's.  

I am sure that Tina is doing just fine and she is certainly no underdog.   I stand up for what I believe in and what I think is right, and I hope you do the same.   But I have seen this "movie" and the "same actors" played out too many times on this Forum, and it is wearing pretty thin.

Michael -- I am not attacking people -- I AM attacking a narrow-minded "group mentality" that typically turns into a "feeding frenzy."

sueincc

by sueincc on 04 May 2010 - 14:05

"In my opinion, the biggest threat to the GSD is the training -- "Protection Phase" of Schutzhund -- that is going to put the GSD at risk of being labeled a "dangerous/at risk" dog. This is actually already happening. " (maggs)

In her opinion????  Where in the world does this crap come from?   She knows nothing of schutzhund and in fact there is no statistics anywhere that bear out her statement.  In fact the only thing her stupid remark does is it should leave no doubt in anyone's mind that maggs is nothing but a troll who will say anything for attention.  Truth and fact means nothing to her.   As usual all she knows is this statement will piss people off and garner her further attention.  Since she is incapable of figuring out how to curry positive attention, she settles for negative attention because in her weird and sick world negative attention is better than no attention at all.  She is sick and needs more help than anyone here can possibly give her.  The best thing to do is ignore her. 

Michael you need to understand you are not the Lone Ranger in trying to reason with maggs using logic.  All of us in the beginning tried to reason with maggs, and soon discovered that  "logic" and "reason" mean nothing to her.  Just as we discovered having patience with her also has no effect.  Pretty soon she will most likely start abusing you too, for your trouble, as she has all of us.  Go back and read her last idiotic post, (***see below, BEFORE she edited it)  see what she has to say about all the members of this board.  What kind of a sick person continues to post on a message board made up of people she doesn't respect and who obviously do not respect her? 

Welcome to the club, Michael. 

***"Face it -- If anyone comes on this Site and does not think as you think -- goes against the narrow-minded "group thought" on this Forum -- you guys just "freak out." If this "group mentality" weren't so twisted and pathetic, it would be laughable."
(maggs)


MaggieMae

by MaggieMae on 04 May 2010 - 14:05

Sue -- I don't say anything to get attention.  I speak my opinion -- I don't worry about whether it will be "popular" with the "group mentality" here.   You, are extremely insecure and it shows.   Sorry for you.

by TessJ10 on 04 May 2010 - 14:05

Nope, doesn't cut it.  You can't say over and over and over again, "these are not GSDs, these are not GSDs," and at the same time say over and over and over again that you're "breeding the old time GSDs I knew as a child."  What bunk.  Make up your mind.  Either you're breeding "not GSDs" or you're breeding true to GSD standard the way they should be.   You can't make two contradictory statements and not expect to get called out about it.

Besides, the "old-time" GSDs were not heavy, massive dogs with long coats and no drive and soft temperments.  So more bs.  Who would believe that stuff?  If you take the trouble to learn about the breed, you'll know all that stuff is bull. So again, don't expect to come on here saying such untruths and not get blasted for such falsehoods.

Keith Grossman

by Keith Grossman on 04 May 2010 - 14:05

"Tina is not breeding GSD's and she does not claim her Shiloh's are GSD's."

This is true but it is her marketing hype, "Dedicated to preserving the exceptional qualities of the OLD STYLE German Shepherd Dogs," that makes the connection.  It also suggests that her dogs are the original embodiment of our breed which is patently ridiculous.

Krazy Bout K9s

by Krazy Bout K9s on 04 May 2010 - 14:05

Thanks Tess, and Keith, well said!!!!

Keith Grossman

by Keith Grossman on 04 May 2010 - 14:05

I see that while I was responding, Tess caught the obvious contradiction as well.

by beetree on 04 May 2010 - 14:05

It is all about attention with MM, TIna-- do you feel rescued by the "kindness" and "open mindedness" of Maggie? This is her favorite ploy to start stirring up the pot. See now, it will all be about her and your thread and point however controversial, will be lost. Her opinion really is an agenda to disrupt and create disscension on this board. She likes creating "us vs. them" because she thrives on creating controversy. When this board is happy and people are feeling tolerant towards each other, she becomes invisible because there is nothing on which to feed upon.

sueincc

by sueincc on 04 May 2010 - 14:05

How many schutzhund trials has maggs attended?  (none)
How many schutzhund dogs has she so much as held the leash? (none) 
How many books has she read on the subject? (none)  
Has she ever read a schutzhund rule book? (nope) 
Are there any statistics anywhere that back up her silly claims? (nope)

Oh but she has watched a couple of clips on You Tube so naturally maggs feels justified in offering up an opinion about schutzhund.  What's new about this? (nothing)  This is what she does, because having any real knowledge about a subject before forming an opinion is apparently not necessary and a waste of time in maggs odd little world!

She's a riot!

mollyandjack

by mollyandjack on 04 May 2010 - 14:05







 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top