GSD fraud? - Page 11

Keith and Tess:  I agree with you 100%, and I too am frustrated with how she markets her dogs.  I don't have a problem with her creating her own breed, I don't care about that, and prefer it because  she distances herself from the GSD.  Her marketing of the dogs as some sort of original GSD is nothing but complete bullshit and we all know it.  Her dogs are not working dogs they are lawn ornaments, very large lap dogs, which is fine and dandy if that's what people want.  BUT they are nothing like the breed envisioned and developed by Max Stephanitz.  All anyone has to do is read what he wrote and look at old pictures to understand that fact!

Oh, Tess and Keith -- I sure wish you could have seen Sue's original post about 2:00 a.m. EST -- she then changed the wording when I told her that I agreed 100%.   Now she is posting "what" she perceives to be "popular group think."   INSECURE.

Oh well, I have things to do now.   Will check on this SSDD later.

Michael, obviously you are wrong!  The frauds ARE using reputable GSD kennels to breed *their* versions of shilohs!

<<  Futhermore, serious gsd breeders would never breed their dogs to a Shiloh, so for the most part you're crying wolf to the wrong people >>

I think that you need to look at these AKC -- 100% PURE GSD -- pedigrees!  http://shilohfraud.com/

Maggie, if I had agreed with you, it would certainly have been by accident. Maybe Sue needed to clarify what she wrote so that nobody else would mistake her opinion. Perfectly legitimate; it's called drafting. People do it so their written word will actually reflect their ideas...not so they can be mealy-mouthed.

Wrong Maggie I was up I have a copy of it. If she changed it, she only changed the words the meaning was the same.

Michael49,

How is your day going and a public apology would be appreciated