Prager, here's your chance to explain - Page 2

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

wetzler

by wetzler on 07 December 2010 - 13:12

 do any of you have one of the pups

because if you don't then he DON'T OWE YOU SHIT!!!!!!!

MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS!!!!!!!

by jamesfountain98 on 07 December 2010 - 13:12

It's hard to read tone, but it seems people are too defensive. I missed Hans/Prager first thread and  normally think his threads and comments are very informative. So if he would so nicely explain from an educating the public point of view that would be great.

But if he believes the original poster has some ill intent then I understand.

LadyFrost

by LadyFrost on 07 December 2010 - 13:12

I agree with wetzler...no one owes anyone any explanation unless they are directly effected by it...people can b*** and rave and complain but no one here owes anyone a thing....we all have parents and don't need cyber parental controls.

by Gustav on 07 December 2010 - 14:12

Slamdunc, you hit it right on the mark!!! use the pm route if there is no agenda.

by desert dog on 07 December 2010 - 14:12

I agree  that Hans doesn't owe any one on here a thing. But what the lady did was a nice thing to do , she opened this thread and made a door for him to respond as he tried to do but was cut off. Notice she asked him if he would like to respond. I don't think that sounded like she was pouring salt in a wound. I thought it was kind of her to do so. Not every one on here has a vandetta to settle.
hank

by faq2 on 07 December 2010 - 14:12

there is nothing wrong with the o.p. some of us might be too busy to read this site everyday. it is something people would like to hear, maybe one wanted to buy a dog from this breeder....or after hearing this maybe not?

Ruger1

by Ruger1 on 07 December 2010 - 15:12


          Honestly I was very interested to hear what Prager/Hans said in his defense....I HATE hearing one sided stories....However, as wetzler so clearly stated, it really  isn't any of my business and he does not owe me a thing... If I really needed to know I would have asked in a PM as Jim suggested.....I do think that the OP had good intentions in starting this new thread....JMO

                   Deanna...: )

by triodegirl on 07 December 2010 - 16:12

I have no ill will towars Hans. I do not know him except for reading his posts on this board and checking out his web site a few times.I did consider buying a dog from him in the future.

I am not so much interested in the person who bought one of the pups but in the reason for the breeding. I am not a breeder but have learned in the 4 or 5 years I have been here that this is not something you do. Or so I thought. So I was interested in the reasons for the breeding.

I thought Hans would welcome the chance to explain but if not, then I sincerely apologize.

by sable59 on 07 December 2010 - 16:12

Hans did nothing wrong as i see it.he explained to all it was a case of not being careful enough with both brother and sister in the house.the buyer was aware of what she got so let it go.we have at this point lost one of the most knowledgeable men on this forum.let it be!!

by faq2 on 07 December 2010 - 16:12

if this breeding did happen the pups should be culled and NOT be sold. They cannot be registered either. Not a rep. that a breeder would want to have if they do care about the breed and not just the money. 





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top