This is a placeholder text
Group text
by steve1 on 10 April 2011 - 05:04
by steve1 on 10 April 2011 - 05:04
by VomMarischal on 10 April 2011 - 07:04
by uvw on 10 April 2011 - 17:04
here they are rolling around in dirt trying to find homes. look, his pads are kind of dry too. must mean i should switch him to orijen fish.
here's a shiny wet nose for you after getting cleaned up halfway through the adoption event.
here's a closeup, any wetter would just be snot.
and i never called your dog shit eaters. i was just repeating what molly said - all her boarders eat crap food like dog chow and kibbles and bits. nor did i say there was anything wrong with your dogs in particular.
so defensive.
and don't call me sonny, gramps. lol.
vom marischal, good point, lol. but if you think about it...if the general public informed and wasn't so stubborn, and demanded more and better, then the pet food industry would have to start getting their act together. and if they got their act together, raw diets would be more readily available (and possibly more economical) to people like steve.
natural food is always better than processed food. not everyone in the usa is obese, but don't you find it odd that we are one of the most obese countries on the planet...and we have more cheap processed food available to us than anyone else.
by VomMarischal on 10 April 2011 - 17:04
Cute dogs.
by JulieM on 10 April 2011 - 18:04
by JulieM on 10 April 2011 - 18:04
( hate my page getting cut off ) now I can't remember the last paragraph. I guess my point really is to each their own. The end results should be the health of your dog and what works best for them that also is what you can do and work with. That is different for everyone and each dog.
by brynjulf on 10 April 2011 - 18:04
Can we call a truce on this subject??? Can we agree that raw feeders like the results of raw and kibble feeders like the results of kibble?????? I have and do feed both. Some dogs can handle raw and some cannot. Some dogs can handle kibble and some can not. I have seen fantastic coats on raw fed dogs and I have seen fantastic coats on pedigree. The only difference I have actually seen with my own eyes is that dogs that are hyper on kibble can benifit from a change to raw. Why I don't know. Do i think one is better than the other??? Maybe ? I prefer to feed raw as it smells fantastic. But do I feel it is better??? eh, umm, er, can't honestly say. I get it at a very good price, this also affects my decision to feed raw. I fed about 20 dogs per month ( board or training) and have seen every manner of feeding. The only feed that absolutely had negative effects was a food called mainstay but mainstay feed with meat seems complete. I just don't know...
by VomMarischal on 10 April 2011 - 19:04
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqX2vCA_Z8A
by steve1 on 10 April 2011 - 20:04
So you do not think a dry nose on a dog means anything, I thought you would come to that conclusion that shows and tells me how little you know about dogs in general,
I tell you what uvw, You think by throwing a lump of meat with bone at a dog constitutes a sound diet for dogs which are fed Raw that i see and so does every one else, along with the dry noses of your dogs But more important is the way you laugh at the dry nose.
IT is very important ask your bloody vet if you have one, or you should know one for Vaccinations at times for your dogs
However you have shown me and all on here no matter if they feed Raw or Kibble diets, that you know squat about feeding dogs in general read this again and digest it , i will put it in Capitals so you can read it
THE FOOD FEEDS THE BLOOD, and THE BLOOD FEEDS THE BODY understand that
However this is the last no more to say to you, except this.
you have been Measured, Weighed and found Wanting
You simply do not know how to feed dogs to keep them in top condition
Steve1
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top