AKC, "to better the breed", and financial worth... - Page 1

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by EMTBStephanie on 13 September 2003 - 20:09

I have some questions that I will hope open a can of worms but not start a overheated thing...maybe I'm just naive or too curious. It seems alot of working dog people aren't big fans of AKC. Why do they still support them through registering their dogs? Why are AKC registered (working) dogs worth more money than unpapered dogs with proven (DNA) and equal quality parentage? Some people feel that if a dog is not AKC registered, it does not qualify as a dog that will "better the breed". Is a dog really considered nothing if it doesn't have a $25 certificate from them? Basically...what is the big deal about AKC when they don't really have a whole heck of a lot to do with working dogs? Can you compete in the GSD Championships with an unpapered dog? I didn't think so, but I would like confirmation. I appreciate anyone shedding light on this for me, I feel like I'm a little in the dark on some things since I'm fairly new to the schutzhund world. I get alot of "that's just how it is" and not enough "this is why things are this way...". Thanks.

by JanisNovak on 13 September 2003 - 21:09

Those are really interesting questions. I'm not sure I have all the answers, but I have some. To compete in WDA events, all dogs over the age of 12 months must be AKC registered. The WDA is a branch of GSDCA which is the breed club recognized by the AKC. Next, is the question of puppy buyers. Most who are shopping for purebred pups are not going to be satisfied with anything other than AKC registration. In the US, AKC papers = purebred dogs. AKC is NOT a qualitative organization but it IS recognized as the purebred registry and they do a fair amount of public education to ensure that buyers DO know to ask for AKC registration. Buyers like to have an official pedigree for their pups. JDN

by The Axe Man on 14 September 2003 - 03:09

Stephanie, Sometimes newbie's can see the truth that sometimes blinds others that have been involved for years.It's about money & control.It's the same worldwide.Re schutzhund- really ask the hard questions as most of these "training directors" have trained bugger all.I'm a ex Police Dog Handler/Trainer(14yrs)19yrs on the job.I was continually amazed (still am) at how many schutzhund trainers say/think they can train police dogs better than full time police dog trainers.The truth is how many police dog trainers say they can train schutzhund dogs better than schutzhund trainers? None I've meet.Perhaps this says it all.I believe most people go to schutzhund thinking that their dog will be trained to protect them, when & if required. Most will not.What is the percentage of schutzhund "drop outs".I bet no schutzhund org would be game to answer that.

by Xeus on 13 October 2007 - 03:10

AKC is like buying Nike over another brand, its all in the perception of bigger, faster, stronger and so on.  Buy a dog that works and works well. 


AgarPhranicniStraze1

by AgarPhranicniStraze1 on 13 October 2007 - 03:10

Well I think pretty much JanisNovak summed it up so in a nuttshell we register with AKC because well we HAVE to in order to compete at events.  We have no choice also when it comes to breeding dogs because well that's all the public understands.  If you told someone not into GSD's or imports that the dog was not AKC registered but had pink papers they would think the dog was not worth a grain of wheat; when in fact it's really the same damn thing only maybe even slightly better in my eyes because it was bred in Europe.  As for why most working dog people have negative things to say about the AKC events is well because they aren't as intense for one and for another thing most people don't buy a GSD to do agility competitions.  The obedience from what I understand is ok but I'm told in schutzhund the obedience must be perfect.  If AKC implemented events that were comparable to SCH- done in 3 parts for working dogs then I think they'd get more support.  I know people personally who've tried SCH but then decided to do AKC instead.  Why?? Some claim that it was easier for them, others stated reasons as having difficulty in their dog performing well in a phases in SCH, and some just weren't into tracking or doing bitework.  And honestly SCH is not for everyone but that shouldn't mean you can't or shouldn't own a working dog if that's what you like.  As long as the dog is working doing something you both enjoy then go for it.  If AKC events are what tickle your fancy then so be it.  One of these days I may even try one just to see what it's all about; who knows I may even like it?? lol


yellowrose of Texas

by yellowrose of Texas on 13 October 2007 - 04:10

For      many years AKC would not acknowledge the USA Schutzhund ....they could care less that they existed.....but it is the only registrar and all of the dogs for years have gone thru AKC....to have a traceable pedigree after the dog get here from Europe,,,and to also trace any dogs here over the last several decades,,,,you cant just throw akc away.....It helps keep a trace , and now through DNA, to the pedigrees so highly sought after...

Sure there are a lot of inconsistencies and problems , as in any big organization....AKc now has recognized SCHUt .   which I assume the titles can now go on pedigrees....

This was one big complaint.....no schutz titles were ever rrecognized....now I assume they will be.   and can appear on the certificates...more book work which will increase the fees again...


by southtexan on 13 October 2007 - 13:10

IMO....The AKC is a good method for ensuring dog owners they are buying/selling purebreed dogs. Without some legit method of tracking a pedigree you would never really know what you have.

Yes I know some people have found ways to cheat.

The AKC does not and cannot govern ever breeding that takes place. IMO this is a good thing as each breeder has to make their own decisions on breeding. On the other side it is good to have specific groups that require breeders to meet their standards in order to belong and breed dogs. Even GSD breeders all over the world argue on the proper breeding standards not only between show/working lines breeders but even within each group. And yes you have corrupt breeders/judges etc in everything  but overall most are honest and trying hard to better the breed as they see it.

Again, this is my opinion and realize some of you will not agree which is fine. Just realize you should not just blame the tool (AKC) but the people. Having a pup that is AKC registered does not mean you are getting a good dog, but then getting a pup from Europe with his pinks does not guarantee you the pup is a good one. Even if both parents are Seiger VA and have Schutzhund titles some of the pups can/will be of lower quality. In the end a smart buyer takes their time, researches carefully and fully understands the type GSd they want, gets help from trusworthy GSD people if possible,asks alot of questions, visits the kennel if possible and makes trip to see the pups once they are at least six weeks old, the older the better imo.

YOU have to find a good dog, no way a club like AKC or SV etc can do that entirely for you.

hope this helps.


sueincc

by sueincc on 13 October 2007 - 13:10

I have a question along similar lines:

It was my understanding that in order for GSDs to compete in world events, the dog had to be reg with AKC because FCI recognized AKC as the only legitamite registration organization in the USA.   Now, AWDF is an FCI member  & UScA is a member of AWDF.  Does it then follow that  if a dog is registered with UScA and not with AKC,  FCI will consider that dog a registered GSD and therefore eligible for competition in GSD events limited to registered GSDs?  Or is it that FCI still only recognizes AKC as the legitimite registration organization for USA GSDs?


sueincc

by sueincc on 13 October 2007 - 22:10

I bet Chris or Molly knows.


Ryanhaus

by Ryanhaus on 13 October 2007 - 23:10

That's it, I'm entering an AKC show in November,

All this AKC talk..........................






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top