This is a placeholder text
Group text
by aaykay on 14 September 2015 - 03:09
Could be because a GSD suffused with friendly Labrador characteristics, is more politically correct than a GSD with real GSD instincts ? Because a GSD with good GSD instincts, might actually display territoriality and protective behavior (shocking !), and that's a bad thing in the minds of these breeders, and probably even the buyers (who are then devastated that their Lab-in-GSD-clothing, whose every good instinct had been systematically eliminated via selective breeding, does not display any kind of GSD-like behavior when the situation warrants it) ?
by aaykay on 14 September 2015 - 03:09
by vk4gsd on 14 September 2015 - 03:09
"...that would be a utility dog with no excuses made for them."
that is your personal preference, mine to.
by vk4gsd on 14 September 2015 - 04:09
you sound too angry for me to continue to respond to.
by aaykay on 14 September 2015 - 06:09
by Hundmutter on 14 September 2015 - 07:09
OK I'll break my silence - have been reading this thred since the start, with
a great deal of interest. Snotty back-biting aside, some very relevent points
have been debated, my own views have been touched on and described
by other posters so there was no need for me to comment. And I am always
shy of posting on in-depth theds on drives and working ability, since I do not
train bitework in any working or sport venue.
However I am in the fortunate position of being around BOTH Working dogs
and their people AND the UK Show scene, for years, so unlike many posters
have managed to see the GSD breed from both sides. So I will add this into
the debate, now that it has centred on the comments of the last couple of
pages:
I do believe that IN SOME [perhaps too many] DOGS, the discernment ability
and the suspicion has been bred out of the GSD. I don't entirely condemn the
'show/pet' breeding side for doing this - no Show Judge likes to be bitten while
doing their 'Individual' ; and the world is now so full of potential pet owners
who 'must have' the GSD breed for its beauty and versatility, but they want a
couch potato which loves everybody and is safer around their kids, even though
they would also like a dog that barks at intruders, and they themselves do not
want to expend time and energy on any activities with the dog apart from throwing
a ball for it in the park. Some here would defend that as their 'right'; me, I think
they should choose a different breed ...as I have posted many times !
I can say that of the two dogs wholly owned by me - as distinct from the wide
variety of Shepherds I've known / handled, through working with them, boarding
or house-sitting them; exercising them; helping individuals train them - were both
bred by the same Show kennel breeder. She was reasonably successful but not
'top rank'/famous; she was from a working background in that she'd competed
and judged Obedience to start with, and associated with Police and Security dogs
and handlers, and to the end still tried to breed 'all-round' dogs, so that some
went to Show & breeding homes, some to pet lovers, and still some to the Police
and security handlers, also Prisons etc.
The first of my own dogs from her kennel, the bitch Vida, had been a successful
show dog. When I took over it was because her hips score was awful and she
was not to be in the breeding program. (She did not display HD problems, and
lived to 14, but that's more relevent to other threds !), I then did Obedience
with her. I WOULD NOT HAVE TRAINED HER IN BITEWORK EVEN IF I'D
HAD ACCESS TO A CLUB AT THAT TIME, as she was a 'flake' from the nerves
point of view. There are reasons why this was a worse problem than it might
have been genetically which I won't go into detail here about; but Vida
DID: effectively guard my vehicle and my home; DID show some discern-
ment in who she bit or tried to bite, and in 'herding' round me to prevent
an approaching threat. She had next-to-NO 'play' drive, but she did
possess 'prey' drive in spades when it came to cats and foxes and
squirrels.
My more recent dog with the passage of time was not as closely
related to the "Four Pillars" as he came from more modern bloodlines,
he was VERY Uran line-bred. He had excellent hips. He wanted to
be fussed by just about anybody, stranger or not. He had extreme
'play drive' for a ball, though that was his preference above all other
retrievable objects, and would seek his ball in grass and brambles
for hours if allowed to continue looking for it unaided. He never
guarded the car; but he did alert at home. Frankly I would have
expected him to make a reasonable fist of IPO if we'd had the chance
to train in that, but he only got to do basic Ob and some Tracking with
me. He would NOT have made a Show dog, despite his softer temperament
- he threw up on the judges feet the first time I entered him at a Companion
Show ! I took him to one more (where he stood alone), and he did not want
to be there either - clearly considered it boring, despite having the judge to
himself, and could not wait to leave. So much for a Showline bred black&red !
Think what I'm trying to illustrate is that I feel dogs may be bred in certain directions
depending on the breeders proclivities and the state of the market; but they are
still individuals for all that. And therefore a bit of a crap-shoot, dependent on
their owners / handlers abilities and preferences and training skills to realise
their potential in any direction.
by duke1965 on 14 September 2015 - 11:09
amazing that the topic is filled with opinions from people who dont work dogs for real work, dont breed dogs,or dont work dogs at all, all we miss is opinion of someone who dont have dogs at al
by joanro on 14 September 2015 - 11:09
Hm, quote, 'l do believe that IN SOME [perhaps too many] DOGS, the discernment ability
and the suspicion has been bred out of the GSD. I don't entirely condemn the
'show/pet' breeding side for doing this - no Show Judge likes to be bitten while
doing their 'Individual' .'
If the dog has a sound temperament it won't bite the judge. The dogs being excused from the ring for biting are certainly not of sound temperament. Further, there is more to a sound gsd than bite work.
Humans learn by asking questions and have a mental idea on a subject from whence his questions come, so there would be no need for universities if all the students only qualify to participate if they are first fully involved in the subject in the physical relm.
Owning a dog first before ANY knowledge on the subject is usually a bad ride for both dog and owner, but maiinly for the dog.
by Mithuna on 14 September 2015 - 12:09
hntr vs Gee
vk vs Aaakay
Whats next?
by Sunsilver on 14 September 2015 - 12:09
I would sometimes take her on my home care nursing rounds with me, especially if it was after dark.
One day, as I examined my patient, it became very obvious that he needed to make a trip to the hospital. The family called for an ambulance, and I then realized I needed to move my car out of the driveway to allow the ambulance parking room.
"I'll do it for you," the man's son volunteered.
Forgetting the dog (Tasha)was in the car, I handed over my keys.
Suddenly, I remembered about the dog, and went tearing down the hall, fearing the worst.
The man was already inside the car, and putting it into gear. [wipes brow!] and Tasha was perfectly fine with him being in the car. He later told me he was used to large dogs, and she must have sensed his confidence. A car thief would have been anxious/fearful.
Of all the dogs I've owned, she had the truest GSD temperament. Discernment, protectiveness, intelligence...she had it all!
Where did she come from? Well, my room-mate found her wandering the streets of Scarborough. Someone dumped her, possibly because she wasn't good with kids! It was her one bad flaw. She never seriously hurt one...her bites were just warning nips...but still, we had to be very, very careful with her when children were around.
Sometimes pedigrees don't mean a lot.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top