Who Do You Trust - Page 7

Class, knowledge and she stands behind  her dogs.   Obviously it is a gamble with any breeder over the internet as we all just found out, and perhaps I am wrong.  Goodness knows I've defended the wrong breeder before!
 

You said:

Reading these posts, it's pretty obvious how people get ripped off. Oy vey.  The mentality is a bit.......interesting. 

That is kind of funny after the other 36 pages we just went through with a breeder you stand behind.  Have you ever met him personally?  Have you ever bought one of his dogs? 

 

Joanro,

-------------------
Although my pups are priced across the board for twelve hundred whether new owner intends to breed or spay, and everyone gets full registration,

My kind of breeder !  No strings attached, and relying on the buyer to exercise personal responsibility for what he/she is buying. 
-------------------

When I stated the above, I truly meant it.  It was not an insult or a tongue-in-cheek response (don't know if that is what you are referring to, above, where my post was probably misconstrued).  I absolutely love your philosophy.  As mentioned earlier, I certainly don't like "conditional acquisitions" after paying top dollar for a puppy, where the strings never seem to go away.

I personally treat my pups/dogs with great care, and always go out of my way to make sure that their needs (mental stimulation, exercise, food etc) are well taken care of.  I take personal responsibility for them, and will absolutely ensure that they have the best that I can possibly give.  So a contract with all kinds of stifling conditions in it, will not be something I would be pleased with.  If a genetic condition arises later on (HD etc), I will certainly not allow any kind of breeding to take place (again part of my personal responsibility that I took on when I got the pup/dog).

Your philosophy perfectly ties with my needs. 

Aaykay, I wasn't referring to you at all. I was referring to the poster calling people idiots on here. Thank you, maybe we can do business some day?

 I did not make any jokes about Hans, wether it be his weight, or country of origin.

Don't know about you in particular, but as an impartial observer, that thread got very ugly, with a large number of people just jumping on a single person and giving vent to old (but not forgotten) complaints.....literally a lynch-mob, as I mentioned in that other thread.  Frenzied sharks taking bites out of a bleeding animal in the ocean.

I personally may not be fat, but I can see how calling someone who has a weight issue as "fat" or "obese" or "ugly" might be treated as an insult, even if it may be "just a fact".  The key is to put ourselves in their shoes and see if you want to be treated in the manner in which you are treating someone else (name calling, jokes on their girth, country of origin, making other accusations on their integrity etc) and by that yardstick, that thread should have been tightly moderated and certain users in sore need of a time-out, till order was restored.

Aakay seems to understand the difference between cruel jokes pertaining to physical attributes vs. opinions and descriptives assigned to DEEDS and ACTIONS. Praise Jesus. 

It's just an issue of sticking to what is pertinent in order to be credible. Forget being decent or moral; that's obviously asking too much. 

Thank you, maybe we can do business some day?

Sure.  I did go through your site, after googling for Charik, and finding it, and I like what I see thus far.  Thank you.

I think you guys are using a broad brush. Many people spoke out, but only one or two made the comments.

aaykay, Just curious. Why don't you buy your next dog from Hans?

aakay, I agree with you, that it can be hurtful, and you actually practice what you preach and are always respectful in your posts.

Wether or not Hans took offence to that little joke, I doubt it, men are not nearly as sensitive on that matter.

Unfortunately Jenni, knowing how clever and intelligent and worldly you are, there are just some things you'll never understand.