This is a placeholder text
Group text
by khlewis on 30 November 2012 - 17:11
http://m.yp.com/adrian-mi/mip/tractor-supply-co-674431?lid=674431
by destiny4u on 30 November 2012 - 18:11
Ruger why should i be ashamed I am not stealing anyones money here.
by Ruger1 on 30 November 2012 - 18:11
This is a good example of folks looking to find any little tidbit of random information to destroy a person reputation, ,,and over $200....
I have said my peace and I hope Bob and his wife weather the storm with as little damage as possible...
Deanna...
by destiny4u on 30 November 2012 - 18:11
Ruger he ruined it himself he never should have done that to someone sorry. I run a business also and i know what is fair and what is being sleezy.
by khlewis on 30 November 2012 - 18:11
Ruger, I am just posting my experience with them. I you have had a good experience dealing with them then I am very happy for you. I believe I have been treated unfairly in this situation and wanted to warn others so that it does not happen again. Also, maybe bob and his wife will leave this learning something about customer service. Again, if you had a good experience with them I am happy that at least someone has.
by destiny4u on 30 November 2012 - 18:11
ruger just because you have a good experience with someone doesnt make them an angel. Many people had good experiences with TEd bundy also.
by hexe on 30 November 2012 - 18:11
Ugh. What a cesspool.
I can't say that I get 'warm fuzzies' over the seller being willing [initially] to sell a 2 yr old dog that, in his own words, was being sold, 'as a pet, not for working', to a buyer who openly informed him she wanted the dog for BREEDING.
The would-be buyer doesn't inspire me to defend, either--you're told the dog is being sold for pet purposes, but your intentions are to use it for breeding anyway. Standards be damned!
Way to protect the integrity of the breed, folks.
Take it to small claims court, both parties. That's what we pay judges for...crap like this.
I can't say that I get 'warm fuzzies' over the seller being willing [initially] to sell a 2 yr old dog that, in his own words, was being sold, 'as a pet, not for working', to a buyer who openly informed him she wanted the dog for BREEDING.
The would-be buyer doesn't inspire me to defend, either--you're told the dog is being sold for pet purposes, but your intentions are to use it for breeding anyway. Standards be damned!
Way to protect the integrity of the breed, folks.
Take it to small claims court, both parties. That's what we pay judges for...crap like this.
by Ruger1 on 30 November 2012 - 18:11
khlewis and destin4u,,
You both can say what you like, but this says less about Bob actually, and way more about the both of you...I have not done business with Bob; he offered me "free" help ,,,
Its sickening to think how low folks will go to bring another person down, but in your attempt to bring down Bob you have brought yourself down lower,,,
Ted Bundy???...really..sigh..
by khlewis on 30 November 2012 - 18:11
I have just read through all of my emails and Bob never told me that he was being sold as a pet. I made my intentions clear that I was looking for a stud dog and Bob did tell me that he had never been bred, but other than that he never said anything about this dog being pet quality or that he was not workin quality. All of my dogs are taken to training for protection, tracking, and obedience, so I know that they are capable of performing the tasks they were originally intended for.
by destiny4u on 30 November 2012 - 18:11
the breeder was going to give her to regardless even if she used it for breeding he didnt care at first. THey were both wrong with that part. He was going to give her a 500 pet quality dog for breeding lol He knew she was going to use the dog for breeding.
Rugar I am stooping low because i think stealing someones money is wrong? lol
Rugar I am stooping low because i think stealing someones money is wrong? lol
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top
