Sloping backlines and over angulation - Page 8

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

susie

by susie on 15 December 2015 - 18:12

It´s like always -

the showscene tending to "overangulated"
the sportscene tending to "underangulated"
but both scenes only looking at their personal goal.

But WHAT is the goal of these different scenes?

Showscene: A floating trot, as fast as possibble
Sportscene: A fast gallop, and the ability to make fast turns

The German Shepherd dog is no wolf, it´s a BREED with a breed standard, a result out of different sheep herding dogs, but combined with the vision of the creator of this breed. There is a standard - according to this standard the German Shepherd dog is a TROTTER, well angulated, but neither over- nor underdone.

Right now BOTH scenes lost the vision of the breed, BOTH scenes are trying to breed a dog fitting its goals, but not fitting the standard.

You mentioned M. Heyne - he didn´t like "over"angulated dogs - but MORE IMPORTANT - he didn´t like prey driven dogs, not able to work on its own...

by joanro on 15 December 2015 - 18:12

An imageThis is normal.


by Ibrahim on 15 December 2015 - 18:12

Joanro, sorry but this dog lacks in rear angulation though backline looks to be super

by Ibrahim on 15 December 2015 - 18:12

Susie, one direct question
I believe in the standard but I strongly think latest amendments are pro overangulation, should I support it or speak against it?

by joanro on 15 December 2015 - 18:12

Ibrahim says;'.. sorry but this dog lacks in rear angulation though backline looks to be super.'

I'll show you another pic, Ibrahim, and you'll see that she is standing tense and alert with right rear stretched.

by joanro on 15 December 2015 - 19:12

Here, same pup, same dayAn imageher front slightly down hill on the side of road.


by Ibrahim on 15 December 2015 - 19:12

ok

by joanro on 15 December 2015 - 19:12

I know you replied, 'OK', before I posted the second picture :-)

by Ibrahim on 15 December 2015 - 19:12

hahaha, with all fairness she lacks in rear angulation. I wish modern show GSD has her underchest and underline, she has super topline, withers and croup.
Our subject is rear angulation and this is not enough angulation, might be very good on the scale of other working breeds, but a GSD should have a deeper rear, that is a characteristic of the breed, and I am not talikng overangulation like that of Xeph's.

by Ibrahim on 15 December 2015 - 19:12

 Here is what I think is correct rear angulation, deeper than this angulation then we enter danger zone of having loose hocks and unstable rear assembly. Pls do not look at topline, look at the stifle turn (the thigh angle, the one between lower bone and higher bone). If any one wishes I can show a simple way how to spot a correct from incorrect rear angulation.

Correct

An image

And here is what I think is overangulated

An image

 

 

 






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top