This is a placeholder text
Group text
by marjorie on 27 February 2012 - 01:02
one would not be likely to forget. Perhaps you were very young,t hen, and didnt know any better. I do hope you genuinely missed dsurber's post and you are not reverting to the behavior exhibited way back when. I personally believe that people dont change, so I question how you could miss that post by dsurber and my posts explaining the differences between the two diseases. That being said, if you TRULY missed it, I apologize. If you didnt miss it and plan on repeating past unacceptable behavior, this would not be a good time to engage in that behavior. I am feeling tortured, not knowing *when* I should let Missie T go....It will probably be sooner rather than later. If you have any further questions on the subject of why there has been no official announcements about wrong test results not being made available to the public, I suggest you contact Dr Coates and stop making official reporting my responsibility. I have enough on my plate, now. Like you, I have been told of stories like dsurbers, but I didnt ask you for an official site, did I, or imply that you should know of one that is acccesible to the public.
by marjorie on 27 February 2012 - 01:02
by Blitzen on 27 February 2012 - 13:02
I hate to see a hesitation to submit DNA to the UM and/or any other active DM project. Even if one doesn't think the results are valid and doesn't consider them a part of planning breeding, I see no reason to not contribute to the study.
by marjorie on 27 February 2012 - 15:02
by Blitzen on 27 February 2012 - 16:02
If I had a dog with DM, I'd support the new study. Since I don't, I'll stay with Coates' research for now and use those results as I feel appropriate. Others can do as they please.
by GSD2727 on 27 February 2012 - 22:02
Again I have seen it mentioned here and another email list - but no one can provide facts, a study, a website which contains the information, any type of proof of this at all?
I understand that you are disagreeing with the current DNA test available. What I am interested in is if there is any real proof of dogs who are tested n/n or n/a being confirmed to have DM by necropsy? If there is, I would love to see it...
I am sorry you are loosing Missie T - I know how hard it is to loose a dog... I just lost my Libby last Sept and it still hurts.
Valerie
by marjorie on 27 February 2012 - 23:02
I am going to start gathering info from my DM site- my webmaster is working on putting up a page for me. The only one who would have all the official data is U of Missouri and they are not publishing anything to my knowledge, in relation to mistakes. Dsurban would not say what he did without it happening, It would be too easy to verify. Do the u of Missouri DNA tests have numbers assigned to each dog who was tested? If so, I
need to put a space for the test number on the page my webmaster is working on, for me, to collect data.
by GSD2727 on 27 February 2012 - 23:02
Thanks for the info! As far as I know there are three different places doing the DNA test, I am not sure if they all assign numbers or not. Will be curious to see what you find out.
by marjorie on 28 February 2012 - 00:02
by beetree on 28 February 2012 - 00:02
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top