Dwarfs in Ireland - Page 4

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by NO FEAR on 12 February 2010 - 23:02

Hi Mrs Worley

I think you have just proved Jona right . Breed from a dog with a high hip score & then try to justify it . I,m definitely am finished with this site . Breeders like you the GSD doesnt need

Ps

no need to apoligise when I,m proven rite about dog producing dwarfs

by Mark3 on 12 February 2010 - 23:02

There is a DNA test for PD now, so there really isn’t any excuse.  

www.videxgsd.com/DNA_test_pituitary_dwarfism.htm

As Videx says ‘If all breeding animals were tested (only once), and a correct breeding policy would be implemented, this severe illness could be completely eradicated‘.

www.videxgsd.com/dwarfism_vdh_action.htm

Sue Worley

by Sue Worley on 12 February 2010 - 23:02

Nofear, I didn't say use dogs with high hips and then try to justify it, you should have read what I said more closely, i said I would use the dog if I knew the rest of his lines and those of the prospective mother, big difference.... I have been striving for years now to improve on every mating I do,  I have used dogs here and in Germany and The Netherlands, always with the intention of having something for myself to continue my lines with, what do I want with animals with problems, I don't and neither does anyone with the breed at heart, it's not like building cars, sometimes things rear their ugly heads and there is nothing that could have been done to prevent it other than not breeding at all, believe me it is absolutley soul destroying when things go wrong, all the hope and expectation that has been put into a prospective litter just disappears down the drain, not funny....... 

by Blerio on 13 February 2010 - 02:02

Jonah1, You're reply sounds as though I should know you! That's the problem with people who come to this site with no identity. I may have had many a drink with you at shows. I want to understand every bodies point of view, I'm not bothered, I'll listen to most people for a while!!! until they demonstrate they are talking shite! If you are a reasonable sort of person and know Sue Worley you wouldn't be talking like this. If it was so easy to breed and produce every time, "everything in the right order", life would be so easy and straight forward, but ain't life a bitch. regards Bill Owen.


by hodie on 13 February 2010 - 03:02

The DNA test for a type of pituitary dwarfism does NOT test for every reason for dwarfism. I know from personal experience, having sent samples to the researcher who developed this test. I had three dwarfs in a litter of 8. The three were euthanized at 12 weeks of age due to severe health problems and their samples sent. They tested negative for the specific type of dwarfism, but there was no doubt that the three were dwarfs. To assume that getting the DNA test mentioned will clear up the problem is naive. 

by NO FEAR on 13 February 2010 - 08:02

Mrs Worley

Sory but think u need to reply straight ansewr to straght question I asked if you wud use this dog with a hip score of 27 . You repled yes if you knew his family back ground . You DO KNOW the dogs family background so I,m asking you again wud you use on any of ur females this dog ?

by Penny on 13 February 2010 - 09:02

How did Dwarfs in Ireland turn to Hips in England !!  - 
keep to the thread guys.... there is a lot of reading on dwarfism, and like hodie says its not as clear and cut as one test fits all.   I havent seen a dwarf, but if Hodie had to lose three at 12 weeks, that is terrible, and I dont think we can say its not too bad and there are other worse problems.   Losing a puppy is bad enough at any age, but to rear them til they are 12 weeks, feel for you Hodie - we can only do our best then, and use the test we have and hope that it covers the "type" that can be detected by this test.  Further information would be good.  Mo.

by petowner on 13 February 2010 - 10:02

I agree with you Penny BUT what breeders say and what they actually do is a different matter in some cases.   Hodie. Sorry to hear of your misfortune with your puppies it must have been awful for you, can you let us know which dwarfism test you used ?. I contacted the Utrecht university in the Netherlands and they assured me that their test for pituitary dwarfism gave a definite result for carrier or non carrier status.      Simon.

kesyra

by kesyra on 13 February 2010 - 10:02

Hi Mo

I wasn't implying that producing dwarfs is no big deal, but there is apparently a DNA test for the pituitary dwarfism, carried by a simple autosomal recessive gene, that I thought we were 'discussing' on this thread.

I had 3 dwarfs out of a litter of 7 back in the 80's, in one of my early litters. Dwarfism was obviously around then, as 2 other very well known breeders looked at them for me and both recognised they were dwarfs, having had the defect themselves.
The pups were obviously not quite right from around 3 weeks old and I had to have them put to sleep at 8 weeks.  Distressing at the time yes, but if I had the choice of having 3 dwarfs or having 3 apparently healthy pups, who then go on to develop severe health issues such as AF or Epilepsy, I would rather have to go through the heartache myself and not pass on a problem to a pet owner. That is what I meant when I said there are worse defects to have.
I haven't had any dwarfs myself since then and nor would I wish to, but in an ideal world, I wouldn't wish to produce any other defect either! Unfortunately, life's a bitch and it doesn't happen quite like this. I am quite convinced that every dog or bitch will carry some defective gene, be it aesthetic defects such as soft ears or overshot mouths to more serious problems as pituitary dwarfism, EPI, AF and many more.
I spoke to Malcolm Willis at the time, a plain speaking man with immense knowledge, for whom I have great respect and he told me in no uncertain terms that dwarfism should be identified in the first few weeks of life and, as a breeder, it was my responsibility to deal with it. He advised not to repeat the mating, (which I had no intention of doing anyway), but there was no need to eliminate carriers from breeding. As it happens, I didn't breed from the bitch again, but I would use a sire who carries the gene, if he was right for my bitch in all other respects, but I would take the precaution of DNA testing first.

If anyone wishes to know the breeding of the litter back in the 80's, then PM me, but I will not respond to anonymous requests. I also have photos, which I could probably dig out and scan, of the three pups at 7 weeks for anyone who is genuinely interested.

Regards, Katrina


by Penny on 13 February 2010 - 11:02

Hi Katrina,

  You say  ......

As it happens, I didn't breed from the bitch again, but I would use a sire who carries the gene, if he was right for my bitch in all other respects, but I would take the precaution of DNA testing first.

Flip, you are braver than me if Hodie states that t here is no one conclusive test.   It sounds like a vile problem to have, I`d steer clear.    Perhaps this thread can seerve to let us all delve in to it sufficiently to find out about this conclusive/non conclusive test.  That would be a little bit of progress.

Mo.





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top