This is a placeholder text
Group text
by eddyelevation on 01 January 2013 - 21:01
by joanro on 01 January 2013 - 22:01
by eichenluft on 01 January 2013 - 22:01
molly
by workingdogz on 01 January 2013 - 23:01
eddyelevation, I beg to differ. Unless you paid for a percentage of him,
Bomber does in fact belong 100% in full to Parrish, and he is under no
obligation whatsoever to allow anyone else to utilize the dog in their
breeding program. Quite frankly, with the way this thread started about
Parrish, I can't say as though I blame him for not allowing access to
the dog. Too many people in this country worry about whether or not the
owner of a stud dog is 'popular', who f'ing cares!?!? As long as you get the
breeding made on your bitch and your paperwork is signed in a timely manner,
it doesn't matter if anyone thinks Parrish is 'cool' or not.
by eddyelevation on 01 January 2013 - 23:01
by kitkat3478 on 01 January 2013 - 23:01
Why in the world would he book more breedings for his dog? You can believe this guy is experienced enough to know where to draw the line.
I could only wish I could get on the list to recieve one of them Christmas gifts, somewhere down the line :)
by eddyelevation on 01 January 2013 - 23:01
by joanro on 01 January 2013 - 23:01
by Paul Garrison on 08 March 2013 - 17:03
Paul
by armauro on 08 March 2013 - 18:03
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top