This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Betty on 02 March 2013 - 21:03
I believe the AKC will take the date of the contract or the date of bill of sale as the date the dog transferred ownership KitKat.
I have never heard of a clause that says you can not bring something public.
I have never heard of a clause that says you can not bring something public.
by rtdmmcintyre on 02 March 2013 - 21:03
Betty a lot of business even have that kind of statement in their employment contract.
its whole purpose is to keep their name from being draged through the mud with out a chance to try to settle it privately.
its whole purpose is to keep their name from being draged through the mud with out a chance to try to settle it privately.
by Betty on 02 March 2013 - 21:03
Perhaps I should of been a bit clearer, yes posting on FB that your boss is a no good sob and your company is run by Satan's Spawn can
get you fired regardless of a written employment contract.
I have seen and signed a lot of contracts in my life and I have never seen a clause like that in anything remotely close to the contract for
a sale of a dog.
get you fired regardless of a written employment contract.
I have seen and signed a lot of contracts in my life and I have never seen a clause like that in anything remotely close to the contract for
a sale of a dog.
by Ramage on 02 March 2013 - 23:03
Well, the clause didn't work very well.
by Cesna on 03 March 2013 - 00:03
The clause will work, especially if it is taken to a court level..
Again...every document I use has been drafted by my attorney, and he has used various contracts we have both seen. And, it is designed to make adults do business as adults..not like junior high girls...
Again...every document I use has been drafted by my attorney, and he has used various contracts we have both seen. And, it is designed to make adults do business as adults..not like junior high girls...
by beetree on 03 March 2013 - 02:03
I will only say, I would never sign such a clause. I'd take my sharpie marker, cross it out, and initial it. Whoo boy. But I wouldn't ever entertain to do half the things that were done by the buyer and the seller, on this thread!
by GSDSRULE on 03 March 2013 - 03:03
"so I told her that the dog could travel in the dog trailer as we traveled to the North American Sieger Show. The fuel charges from point A to point B came to be $350."
So the buyer is supposed to fund your trip to a show? And you were going anyway?
So the buyer is supposed to fund your trip to a show? And you were going anyway?
by CMills on 04 March 2013 - 23:03
Once my trainer was going to a trial with my dog + 3 others. The trip, gas/food were split equally 4 ways, and we each paid our part. I don't think one person should pay for the whole trip.
I don't think LTS should have to pay the whole cost of the trip, especially since she was making the trip anyway.
I don't think LTS should have to pay the whole cost of the trip, especially since she was making the trip anyway.
by Brittany on 05 March 2013 - 00:03
In Donna's defense (I'm defending her this time) the $350 for fuel cost seems a bit expensive. I was wondering if their was something wrong with Cesna's vehical that required $350 worth of gas? If so then it's not Donna's fault. I would like to know how much did it cost (gas wise) to drive out, and to meet Donna.
by Judy P on 05 March 2013 - 00:03
LMS why don't you get off your high horse, pay the $350 and get the paperwork?? You have obviously made enough money from the puppies to cover it? I think I know why - it is because you would rather complain. You have gotten enough mileage from this.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top
