Qualification trial - Page 27

Rik,   
I'm not defending anyone.
You've provided nothing but accusations (no proof) that Charles breeds too young or dysplastic dogs and it  has nothing to do with the topic anyway.
I'm glad you're no longer involved in Doberman Pinscher Show dogs
and I currently DO have a GSD in addition to my Dobermanns

Thomas Barriano
Dubheasa Germania (11/05/99-08/11/08) SchH III M R Brevet AKC WD III AWD 1 STP 1 CD WAC TT
Ascomannis Jago (06/20/03) SchH III AKC WD III AWD I TT WAC
Belatucadrus (08/14/05) DS BH TT MR I
Flannchadh von der Bavarianburg (5/21/08) TT IPO II STP I
Winterfell Arya (11/27/09)BH TT K9NW I
Gwrgenau vom Himmelhoch (8/19/09) BH TT  (German Shepherd)

you the bright guy Thomas, you figure it out. here is a starting point.

http://www.offa.org/results.html?all=Eva+Vom+Mystical+Haus or try Hard Kandee on PDB.

do you honestly believe you are the only person in the U.S. to ever own a dog.

Rik Atchley







 

I don't have to defend my dogs in a post about the USCA creeping out the WUSV qualifier.  Eva vom Mystical Haus is a dog I raised from a puppy (5 months) and she had one elbow that the OFA did not certify but it is not known if the elbow was injured or if it is genetic. Actually both elbows are fine and so is she.  If anyone doesn't like Eva that is fine as I like her a lot.  All USCA members are invited to shop and buy elsewhere. 

booboo, I don't need to lie. the dog was dysplastic elbow. you bred her. it's public record, which I posted from OFA.

what is it I'm supposed to be lieing about. I have some things in the GSD i wish I could have a do over,  but I'm not blaming them on environment. I did it, so did you, own it.

Rik Atchley

An elbow not passing OFA does not make it dysplastic you idiot .. ever heard of injuries simpleton. 

Start a new thread and devote it to bashing me and my dogs .. my dogs nor I need your or the USCA's approval or patronage.

booboo, I'm not bashing the dogs, they didn't do this. you did. I would put every effort at my disposal to rescue dogs from breeding like this, ASL, GSL, WL or just plain old pets that breeders like you produce It's not the dog's fault.

and I like this thread just fine.

jmo,
Rik Atchley

You don't have a clue what you are talking about .. just blowing smoke to divert attention from the deceit and lies the USCA uses as part of their every day tool box like that crap you were spouting about the USCA saving the American GSD .. the same old lies told by the same people and you start to believe them if repeated often enough.

Bubbabooboo
Once again i have been to bed and another one and half pages have been produced. It matters not what you say, you are stirring the Shit un necessary; It seems to me that you have no interest at all in these two clubs and i bet you are not a member. You have no interest in the IPO sport so what is you motive for carrying on? it it just to keep your name in the limelight i guess that would be it.
I guess it would be a good sales ploy to pass on any Pups you breed etc. However it seems that there was never a video made Krista Wade Protection, so my interest has finished also on this thread unless one comes to light so here is another who is leaving this thread.
Steve1

Z Dog
Do not jump in so quickly, When i said unhappy people, i did not say the whole of the Dog people in the IPO sport in the USA; I was refering to the Guys Posting on this thread. some difference, and i think and i did not think i had to spell that out

Steve1 .. So after the butt kicking the USCA took from the WUSV for breaking the rules and the constitution in March 2013 the USCA shifted focus away from their rules violations by crowing that they were going to sweep (win all positions) at the 2013 WUSV qualifier which they hosted by the way.  The GSDCA-WDA was done they said and they would forever more rule supreme.  To that end Wallace Payne and the USCA threw a litlle hissy fit that the GSDCA-WDA might send contestants who had not scored 270 points in a qualifier to the qualifier trial.  Never mind that the USCA has three trial qualifiers for the qualifier trials and the GSDCA-WDA has but one so it is much easier to qualify for the USCA.  Does a qualifier to a qualifier seem necessary to you Steve1??  Two or more of the GSDCA-WDA best competitors were not able to trial and qualify as they had injuries at the time of the GSDCA-WDA one qualifier but Wallace Payne declared that "honor would not be served" if any competitor who made less than 270 in a qualifier to the qualifier trial was allowed in the 2013 WUSV qualifier. Again how many qualifiers are needed??   It was not fair to the GSDCA-WDA as they could only send 7 qualifiers but they stuck to an idiotic but pre-agreed deal made with the USCA made in prior years.  This si a big problem for the GSDCA-WDA in that they follow the rules and play fair which is a huge disadvantage when dealing with the USCA.  I think we can assume that deal on qualifiers for qualifiers has expired as of 2013.  So the domination of the USCA at the 2013  WUSV qualifier seemed assured and I guess to clinch the victory the USCA picked their most USCA sympathetic home grown judge as their guy (Caputo) at the 2013 WUSV qualifier.  How could they miss ??  .. a 10 to 7 advantage in contestants with a judge known to bash protection scores and sympathetic to the USCA's needs shall we say.  But Kharma is a bitch and the USCA managed to squeeze out four positions on the WUSV team for the USA in 2013 and that was with the "home cooking" advantage of judge Caputo.  So given the USCA's past record of fair play and sportsmanship ( or lack thereof ) I would say that highly irregular protection scoring from a USCA judge at an event that the USCA had declared that they would dominate and crush the GSDCA-WDA is reason for suspicion of foul play and in the case of the USCA damn near a certainty.