This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Slamdunc on 07 August 2012 - 18:08
Since it involved chickens and dogs only one poster besides myself even complained about the post. Where were you?
by Gigante on 07 August 2012 - 18:08
If I saw it I would have called bs right there with you, if you really did.
by Gigante on 07 August 2012 - 19:08
Or, you could be clever like one of the PDB regulars from Texas. This person / now also a breeder bought chickens so they could shoot the neighbors dogs when they came on their property. Sure enough the neighbors dogs came on the property and were killed to "protect" the chickens the poster had just purchased the day before for that sole reason. When the police arrived the proud poster / breeder explained that loose dogs could be killed to "protect" her chickens. She was very impressed with herself and the way she explained the code to the responding officers. |
Second time that I can see that you have brought this to my attention. I didnt follow through on the first. Since you appointed me Chief I will comment.
A kiniving way to get out of a pre meditated killing. The person your refering to I believe is in this link below. BS to sitasmom for this. BS to you as well you said nothing.
The only person reading that thread that had any round thing'es to call bs was bee. Go bee!!!!
http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/german_shepherd_dog/forum.read?mnr=579215&pagen=2
by Gigante on 07 August 2012 - 20:08
by BabyEagle4U on 07 August 2012 - 22:08
-- No, I do not personally know any dog that has been shot by the police. No, none of my neighbors have ever had their dogs shot by the police. Yes, I know 1 farmer who shot and killed a stray dog for killing 2 lambs and mauling a sheep .. and a HS gym teacher who shot and killed a police dog in the school parking lot for mauling a 7th graders face and left arm half off after it broke out the cruiser window during a K9 Unit presentation. You can keep your paycheck.
by GSD Admin on 07 August 2012 - 22:08
Editing is on the rise because we are not going to allow members who proclaim they are done posting here and then when they make a post it is to bash this site, I say move on or at the very least say nothing about the site.
The admins are more in charge now and if I recall correctly that is what some members wanted, less of me, well you got it, but I don't see you liking it anymore.
BTW, I have done some research on this cop bashing issue and have read a lot of threads about bad cops going back way before there were admins so this little song and dance routine doesn't cut it. Take it to your mommy or your wife as it is a serious non-issue. Since I have been an admin 2 or 3 threads about bad cops doesn't make this place any different than any other forum.
by Dobermannman on 07 August 2012 - 22:08
Bull Shit ......... let's see some verification of this story
Thomas Barriano
by Dobermannman on 07 August 2012 - 23:08
"BTW, I have done some research on this cop bashing issue and have read a lot of threads about bad cops going back way before there were admins so this little song and dance routine doesn't cut it. Take it to your mommy or your wife as it is a serious non-issue. Since I have been an admin 2 or 3 threads about bad cops doesn't make this place any different than any other forum."
That's the whole point. The OP wasn't about a bad cop. It was a biased and slanted story attempting to make a good cop look bad. Several posters have pointed out the flaws in the version of the story that Eagles 4U is trying to push and her obvious anti police pro AR agenda.
Thomas Barriano
Dubheasa Germania (11/05/99-08/11/08) SchH III M R Brevet AKC WD III AWD 1
STP 1 CD WAC TT
Ascomannis Jago (06/20/03) SchH III AKC WD III AWD I TT WAC
Belatucadrus (08/14/05) DS BH TT MR I
Flannchadh von der Bavarianburg (5/21/08) TT IPO I STP I
by GSD Admin on 07 August 2012 - 23:08
I have no problem with the debate of ideas (good or bad) or the debate of concepts. Where I have the problem is members trying to portray this site anti-cop. This site is no more anti-cop than the general population. I am sure the members complaining about cop bashing would like to see the members they feel bash get banned. I would love to hear some suggestions from anyone claiming cop bashing on how we should handle it. Instead of all the negative comments about this site and it's members. Much more constructive IMHO.
If BEs posts are non-sense she knows what will happen. She will be refuted and it is not like she has never been refuted in the past.
Personal attacks, site bashing and negative admin statements are pretty much getting you edited.
I edited the original post, if there is no abuse report or PM, chances are it might not get dealt with. I can only read so much and do so much here and the admins can't catch it all and report it.
Mystere, I accidently deleted your post. So, reposted below.
Dog shot by police, her only crime was being old by Mystere on 07 August 2012 - 23:08 (userip: 12.150.176.139) |
Mystere Post: 4221 of 4221 Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 03:07 pm Owner edit |
Well, I will just be damned. "This is my article and I would appreciate you just posting a snippet and a link to read the full article, and not post the article in it's entirety. Attribution alone with a link is not good enough. Thank you." Then : " And yes, it's customary to post a snippet from an article and then provide the link to read the rest; that constitutes fair use. Posting the entire article is violation of copyright law. There is no fee to read anything on Examiner, and you don't have to sign up for a thing. Just click the link and you can read the entire article. I'd appreciate it if this post could be amended to do that. Thanks!" And, finally, this: "Can't admin edit it? I understand that you're trying to educate, but that can be done just as easily by a short blurb and the link. Not only is it copyright infringement, it's taking money out of my pocket if people don't click through (and they don't need to, since you posted the entire article)." (Emphasis added) All I can do is shake my head. |
by BabyEagle4U on 08 August 2012 - 00:08
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top