This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Xeph on 09 September 2013 - 08:09
But again, this isn't really about the dog. It's about money.
by beetree on 09 September 2013 - 09:09
Oh Poor Suffering Molly! That tricky Christine! Pulling a fast one over Molly, and her being a breed warden, too? Breaks my heart she might not have got the fire sale bargain she was looking for! I am glad Amanda came to her defense to explain how the purpose of the video is to expose the bad breeder who won't give Molly her money back. Time for the dog to mysteriously disappear into some retired cops living room until this gets settled in court. I truly think the dog will do much better living on any one's couch somewhere. Nervous, and aloof, sure, but the shy part, I'm not so convinced. That dog just knows she doesn't like what Molly is offering her, and her life sucks in that kennel. And yes, how else to say it, but gosh darn stupid not to pick the crap up when you are making a tell-all video to shame another breeder. Geeze.
This link explains all about being qualified for Breed Warden
http://germanshepherddog.com/regulations/breed_warden_tattooer_regulations.htm
by zdog on 09 September 2013 - 09:09
by Blitzen on 09 September 2013 - 09:09
It's all about money now, the seller has been exposed, Molly has been put on display and the flood gates are wide open. What happens now is up to Christina and Molly.
by Blitzen on 09 September 2013 - 09:09
by Xeph on 09 September 2013 - 09:09
by Guppyfry on 09 September 2013 - 09:09
I think the buyer has to take responsibility for doing their homework before dropping the price of purchase on a potential breeding dog.
by Xeph on 09 September 2013 - 09:09
While trying to sell other dogs.
by Blitzen on 09 September 2013 - 10:09
by beetree on 09 September 2013 - 10:09
If you are going to complain about drama, try to refrain from it yourself. It starts with accuracy and this part of your statement was anything but that, it is chock full of exaggeration and assumption.
"No one is denying that the dog is a mess, that the woman who sold the dog has committed fraud and is a cheat, and that the owner has a right to be upset and angry"
This is headed to court if we go by past experience. Right now it would be best to see what "ransom" is required to get the dog to some other place than where she is, without paying Molly $3500 dollars.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top