Our Dog Max Shot By Copy - Page 4

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Preston on 25 May 2007 - 05:05

First off, cruelty to animals is often a red flag for much more serious deviant and criminal acts. Jeffrey Dahmer started out his life of serial torture, sadism and murder by cruelty to animals when he was a child.  Any expert knowledgeable of violent sociopaths, serial killers or ritual satanic abusers will tell you cruelty to animals is often a significant background behavior.  Most modern police departments have instituted psychological screening which utilize standard psychological tests to weed out sociopaths and other serious personality disorders.  Police officers that are sociopaths or have passive aggressive personality disorders can constitute a serious risk to the community when they carry a badge and a gun, especially when they work alone. Smaller or less professional police depts may not understand what a passive-aggressive type cop is or how he can become a serious danger to the community when placed in complex situations which require good judgement and a cool head with a real concern to operate in a manner supportive to the community.  PA cops have extremely poor judgements in some complex situations because they tend to cognitively distort what they see and then over-react.  This makes them a serious danger to the community.  Then they may lie and manipulate like a sociopath to coverup their misbehaviors.  This so called police officer in question should be completely investigated for any possibility of: alcohol abuse on the job; personality disorder, focusing on passive-aggressive or sociopathic or alcohol or drug abuse; any history of sadism, cruelty, mental or emotional abuse or sexual abuse against his own girlfriend, spouse or children or neighbors, any possible history of date raping or forced sex, or using his badge to manipulate sex from women in return for cancelling a violation; any history of wanton killing or torturing of animals as a child; any involvement with cases where an arrestee died mysteriously on the way to jail.  Individuals who needlessly kill and/or torture animals may be extremely deranged mentally and can pose a serious threat to the community they are supposed to serve. Police officers are employed to serve the public and not to abuse them.  Most police officers nowdays really do care about doing a competent job and are normal psychologically. But there are always a few really bad apples and these folks need to be forced out by the demands of the public with the help of the media and community organizations and leaders. It is always the right thing to do for a police officer to call animal control for assistance in situations like this, especially when it does not involve an armed perpetrator holding a hostage or sniping at police or the public.  There was no rush in this situation and he could have backed off and called for help, and could have called the residence in question.  


Vom Brunhaus

by Vom Brunhaus on 25 May 2007 - 11:05

Seriously............. keep in mind this Officer has priors for the same thing - SHOOTING DOGS. Every town and County has whats called Animal Control Officers who respond to help the Police regarding incidents involving dogs. There is no excuse WHATSOEVER for what this Deputy did to that GSD. And believe me him and his Sheriffs Dept. are going to get Nationwide attention from the many members of this Site. Luckily none of the neighbors of these people were hit by any of his flying bullets.

by ProudShepherdPoppa on 25 May 2007 - 14:05

OK seriously, I am willing to stipulate the trespassing charge, although if I heard someone sneaking around unannounced on my back porch a dog bite would be the least of their problems.

"Forgot the fact I'm a police supervisor and been in law enforcement over 10 years."  SO, what you are telling us is, in your opinion, this could somehow be justified? 

What about discharging a high powered handgun needlessly in a residential neighborhood?  Is that justified?  What if one of those 7 rounds had gone ino the neighbor's house and killed someone, a child perhaps? Would you still stick up for this deputy?


Vom Brunhaus

by Vom Brunhaus on 25 May 2007 - 15:05

Way To GO PROUD POPPA!!!

by Preston on 25 May 2007 - 22:05

This law enforcement officer not only used very poor judgement, but as PSP points out subjected the surrounding neighbors to undue risk.  He could have hit a neighbor with a richochet or loose round. He could have drawn fire from someone in the house thinking he was a burglar or armed robber (especially if at night), thus exposing himself to needless ruisk.  Most officers face enough great danger everyday from possibl;e automobile crashes, being hit by vehicles when parked at the side of the road, and making traffic stops on folks who can be armed felons, gang bangers or drug dealers who are armed.  It is just plain stupid to shoot a family pet like this (especially in a smaller town or village, since many pet owners view their pets as children.  Needless killing of someone's family pet could be looked at like killing or rapings someone's child by an unbalanced or paranoid person (and there are plenty of these out there as any police officer knows).  In any small town there is always the possibility of a serious individual (perhaps deranged, mentally ill or completely embittered) who will make sure vengeance is extracted against any officer that does this.  If this officer has a pattern of this, he could have generated a high profile for himself to become targeted by one of his prior victims or sympathizer and dealt with in a serious and unpredictable manner when least expecting it.  Plus, it is always possible when someone sees their family pet needless killed in a cruel fashion, they may go temporarily insane and immediately shoot  or attack the officer.  It seems apparent that this officer is not only predisposed to unnnecessarily cruelty to animals, but also not real bright either.  He should care more about himself than he did to take this needless risk.  Plus how does he know whether the pets owner is a retired socom, task force 160 night stalker or other highly trained or disgruntled vet that has specialized in covert ops and wet work and just won't tolerate this kind of abuse.  It's best not to ever abuse these vets or their pets, since many of them will take care of business themselves and their adjudicants will never even see it coming. These folks have served our country well in time of war and deserve respect, but one should never try and violate their rights, push them around, infringe their freedoms or abuse their pets. If one is a police officer he does not want to needless aggravate someone like this to go off. You just never know who who are messing with when you abuse the public.

by ProudShepherdPoppa on 25 May 2007 - 23:05

"In this case the deputy was attacked by the dog and bitten on the leg, ... to protect himself he shot at the dog until the threat was over, and apparently it took more than one shot," Montminy said.

Is there any evidence that Max actually attacked the deputy other than the cop's claim?  Of course, a fine upstanding officer (who has killed three other dogs)  would not lie to stay out of trouble.... would he?  They are already spinning it.


greatestgsd

by greatestgsd on 25 May 2007 - 23:05

You guys are brave to look at the photos, I can not bring myself to look at them! I would want to do something that would put me in trouble for a long time!

by sunshine on 26 May 2007 - 00:05

My sincere condolences to Max's family and friends.  May you soon find solace in another black beauty that is as faithful to you as Max was to the end.  May the authorities quickly investigate this unnecessary act of violence against a loved family member and come to the conclusion that this was an unnecessary act of brutal force.  May the individual responsible understand what he has done to a family and a community that regards law enforcement as their protector. 

It is so very sad.  Please take solace that many here can empathize how it might feel to loose their beloved and faithful friend in such a violent and unnecessary way. 

 


VonIsengard

by VonIsengard on 26 May 2007 - 00:05

Very, very sad story. You have my deepst condolences. I am grateful to see the media coverage this story is getting. I sincerely hope all the negative attention gets this officer what he deserves. Very, very poor judgement on the officer's part.

by seriously on 26 May 2007 - 01:05

You guys must be bored and watching too much CSI.






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top