Who's Posts Do YOU Look for?

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Ceph on 02 October 2007 - 20:10

Awsome topic :)

I tend to look more at the topic title, and it usually takes me a while to get into those even....but for people whose posts I stop for when scrolling down the endless pages of the long threads - usually Do Right, Blitzen, Shelley, SchHBabe, MVF, Agar, Ehret, Bob-o, DH, and olskool - thats all I can think of off the top of my head though.

The ass grabber has got to be Abhay...

~Cate

by yellowrose of Texas on 02 October 2007 - 20:10

ok groupies lets all hugggggggggggggggggggggggggggg

by Ceph on 02 October 2007 - 20:10

lol - and I stop for Don and 4pack for the chuckles and the pics :p

by Shelley Strohl on 03 October 2007 - 14:10

Where IS Bob O these days anyway? I miss his posts.

by triodegirl on 03 October 2007 - 15:10

And I brake for celery posts

Thanks Echo for the mention. I needed a boost of morale today. Everyone's been raining on my parade lately.

by EchoMeadows on 03 October 2007 - 18:10

Shelly he shows up now and then, I like you wish he would appear more often !! I miss his sensibility in it all.

Your welcome triodegirl !! Cheer up the sun will show soon, :-)

by MVF on 04 October 2007 - 05:10

Shelley and Trafalgar.

by Trafalgar on 04 October 2007 - 11:10

I choose by topic first. Within posts I tend to have an attraction to posters who evaluate data/input and draw conclusions based on the "facts at hand" rather than those posters who ALREADY have an opinion are are solely looking for evidence/material to support it. In other words: I believe people SHOULD be looking as carefully at the things that DISPROVE their own opinions AS MUCH AS they're looking for things that back up their current opinions. Without DETACHMENT from existing beliefs it is very difficult to uncover truth because one is blind to everything that might change previously drawn conclusions. Therefore, as a general rule, I tend to like posters for their ability to discuss things rationally and avoid unfounded assumptions. Certainly - original outlook and original ideas go A LONG WAY towards the "enjoyment factor". Some people who have been involved in dogs for a long time feel they have earned a "get out of the need for objectivity" card - and claim "experience" as a substitute for proper empirical observation and data analysis. I'm neutral to "reputation" or "experience" as far as the posts and posters are concerned. I hope I'm making myself clear. Finally, I'm not attracted to posters who are abusive towards - or filled with personal criticism of - other people. MVF is a good example of a great poster, IMO. Thanks for the interesting topic, SS.

by von symphoni on 04 October 2007 - 11:10

this is kind of like the Grammy award speaches..... I would like to thank Don Corleone for making me laugh and Bob-O for inspiring me to greatness, though I have only achieved occasional mediocrity."

Wait... I hate the Grammy speaches. I read and appreciate people who make the effort to try to understand others, not malicious sensationalism. I have lately been really depressed about the GSD and really wanted kind of a mentor relationship with someone whom I would consider as wiser (not hard to find) and yet kind (far harder to find). I dont find total agreement with someone nearly as important as wilingness to listen and try to respond without one sided hostility.

Lisa

by Abhay on 05 October 2007 - 02:10

Wait a minute, Blitzen, did you just grab my ass? or was it Cate? Mr. Zadir told me that both of you girls were checking it out! I can call Doug Butabi and we can swing by and pick you girls up.

Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top

Who's Posts Do YOU Look for? - Page 5

Pedigree Database