Out-crossing GSD with other breeds - Page 11

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

sueincc

by sueincc on 01 December 2007 - 19:12

"Do like I do when you want to make a joke.  Be self defecating (I believe that is the correct word), not nasty towards others. "  (doright)

ARE YOU KIDDING ME?  I believe the word you were looking for is deprecating.  Some who is self deprecating does so to avoid being pompous or arrogant.  Pompous & Arrogant are what you do best.  Not nasty towards others?  Oh please, even you can't believe that about yourself.  You need to check yourself.

You know what, maybe you DID mean self defecating which I guess, would be to crap all over yourself.

 

 

 


sueincc

by sueincc on 01 December 2007 - 19:12

One last thing.  Doright, you once mentioned you thought people had short memories.  Well, I don't .  I remember the disgusting PM you sent to Dawg.  You should be ashamed of yourself.  I'm sorry Dawg, but I'm going to post a snippet of what he said to you so all the world can see exactly what kind of a creep Doright is:

"Okay, little woman. Get my pecker off your mind. Go diddle yourself since your husband obviously does not do it enough. If he did, you would not have such a chip on your shoulders and be so ga-ga over Abhays sexy talk and phony pics. You little pimply assed (since you can assume the size of my pecker, I will assume your fat ass has pimples) mind numb ignorant fool. You wouldn't know a lie or a man if one was in front of you. You have so much to learn but no where to store it, unless you put it in your fat ass crack. Hey, maybe assman Abhay will help you with your storage problem.

Ha Ha, what an absolute idiot. Grow up little girl, and get a life.

Being as nice as I can here and still getting my point across. Abhay already bragged to me in an email, that you contacted him, along with one other from this site, when he did his "applications accepted" thread, but I did not mention it on the database site, because I did not want your husband or boyfriend (if you actually can get one or the other) to know. I did not want to cause you any problems. Now though, I'm all for it. Of course there is that problem with never knowing whether or not he is lying, but hey, who cares right?

Still want to play hardball, little girl?" (do right)

You made up that crap about Abhay bragging about getting an email from Dawg, either you made it up or he did.  You & Abhay make a great couple.

WOW, I feel like I am filthy just from reading it.


by Do right and fear no one on 01 December 2007 - 20:12

He He.  You are right about one thing.  The filthy part.  Would you like me to post A-dogs PM's to me?  Would you like me to post the emails you sent me?  I have done neither out of respect to a lady/s, even though they were disgusting, vulgar and filthy.

Do you remember them there emails from way back Sue?  First you said those terrible things, then you sent another apologizing for those terrible things.  I moved on but you keep following me around on the threads, getting in a dig when you can.  Apparently your apologies meant nothing and that means that your word means nothing, so what could we possibly discuss that I could believe you about, care about?

There is so much I could say in response to the above few posts, but why should I?  It will just cause ya'll to post more and more crap, and I can not change either of you.  The time to change you was when you were being raised, and some how that fell through the cracks.  I do not make things up.  Period.  Don't have to.  Truth is stranger and more interesting than fiction.

So, go on.  No matter how many times you say you are not going to address me or converse with me.  You continue to do so.

I am going to wait and see if someone from Germany in authority states for a fact that there was no wolf genetics used by Stephanitz in the formation of the GSD.  If they do not, then one can only assume that there is a reason for it.  The reason would most likely be that it is true, but that it is a slight embarassment.  To my knowledge, this rumor has been around forever amd no where, not once, has the SV issued a statement repudiating it.  hmmm.......

When you ask someone a question and a yes will put them in a bad light, they usually don't respond, if in fact the answer is yes.  When a no would put them in a good light, they usually just say "no" if that is the correct answer.  Unless of course they are the kind that do not care on bit about telling lies.  There are many of those around.  Aren't there.


sueincc

by sueincc on 01 December 2007 - 20:12

LOL, LOL Go on keep self DEFECATING you lying perv.  Everyone knows, cats out of the bag, you are done.  


by Puputz on 01 December 2007 - 20:12

Shouldn't this be taken to PM? I hate to see a perfectly good thread go the way of the other threads in this message board.

animules

by animules on 01 December 2007 - 21:12

The post went to south way back when people who do not breed, and do not think titles are necessary, but have pets, took it upon themselves to decide if out-crossing would be good for the GSD.   You can't just read learn all there is to now about any use of any breed or style of dog without being out there and trying it.  Reading, studying, and learning is great but only hands experience on gives any person the right to decide what works and what doesn't.

JMO.


by Do right and fear no one on 01 December 2007 - 22:12

Anyone that would like to see the what I wrote to A-dog, or what she wrote to me prior, I would be glad to send to them in an email or a PM the exact words.  I will not post an email or a Private Message that I received from anyone, on this site.  That would be in poor taste.  I will however, respond to anyone concerning this allegation, in a PM, with exactly what I wrote and what she wrote prior to my writings.  I will not divulge what sueincc wrote to me in emails, unless she posts what I wrote to her in emails after receiving hers.  Then, fair is fair.

As A-dog is not the one posting the alleged PM from me above, I will not post her PM in public.

But before any of you ask me to send you what I and they wrote back and forth, think about it first.  Do you believe that I wrote this without provocation or being attacked in a likewise manner first?

I have stated on a previous thread where A-dog and I got "into it", that I did indeed send her a nasty PM, in response to her nasty PM.  I was admonished by some on here that I respect, and it hurt me, and I learned a lesson.  Mush like the lesson I learned about my stupid statement concerning divorced women.  I learned and I have avoided any other stupid mistakes like those I made.  Additionally, those whom I respect on here, the ones that admonished me for my crude and rude remarks stated that they understood why perhaps I did such things, after they knew about the PM and public postings that preceeded my PM and public postings. 

I see that a PM is now posted by sueincc, that was not addressed to her, but to A-dog.  Thereby I can only assume that they shared info, and perhaps are corresponding privately, to coordinate their attacks against me.  I think I am going to cry.

........................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Okay, that was a joke folks.  For "their" sake.  As anyone who is anyone on this site will surely recall.  I have spent many years in the Marines Corps, the Navy and as a Police Officer.  I know how to get mean.  I know how to respond to an attack.  I have stated more than once on here, that if you push me, I push back twice as hard.  I am not an angel, but I am a good guy.  I have had battles with DessertRangers, spook101, Abhay, UglyDog and several others on here.  I ask you, have any of them received a PM from me?  Have any of them received an email from me?  If they did, I beg them to post it here and give them permission to do so.  DessertRanger and Abhay, both threatened to kick my arse more than once on this public site, even asking publicly for a "meet".  I responded to both on this site and did not send any private correspondence to any of them whatsoever.  I did receive an email from DessertRangers, but it contained nothing bad and only had a video of him with his dog.  Our fued ended amicably after that.

It is not my style to correspond privately or to talk bad to a women, but I did slip one time, in response to a PM from A-dog, that was downright crude and rude.  I have no problem getting down and dirty with a man, but I was brought up to respect women, even if they don't deserve it.

A=dog will have to live with it as I will.  She asked for it.  She got it.  I am not ashamed of it.  She deserved it.  She doesn't seem threatened or mentally disturbed by it.  So, no harm done, except that she shared it.  Another lesson learned.  Do not trust her with private info.

Oh, one more thing.  The part about Abhay stating what he did in a PM to me, is true.  I do not know if he was lying or not (he is prone


by Do right and fear no one on 01 December 2007 - 22:12

Oh, one more thing.  The part about Abhay stating what he did in a PM to me, is true.  I do not know if he was lying or not (he is prone to such things as we all know), but A-dog has never denied it.  Only her girlfriend has.

By the way sue.  The cat was never in the bag.  The bag was holding the bag.  Did you really think that your "ace in the hole" was going to bring me to tears or that I would run and hide.  I have faced better than you and dispatched them, before breakfast, many times.  But you keep slinging my way and following me around.  I admit that sometimes it is a pain, but most of the time, it is a little bit entertaining.  Have you ever won an argument on the merits of your point of view or facts?  If you have, I have never read it here.  I have seen you fight with many, usually lowering yourself just below them in the arena of suggestions that go something like "go soak your head in a puddle of sand" or some other silly statement.  You are just too intelligent I guess.  They say that Einstein couldn't find his way around his campus where he taught, and would get lost frequently.  Is that your problem.  Just too darn smart?


yellowrose of Texas

by yellowrose of Texas on 01 December 2007 - 22:12

Do Right:  Do Me  a favor?   go outside and look under the hood of the  Chevy 350 , w/the  a4 on the floor, and the turbo/ and tell me what you see?   Vvvrrroooooommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Okay, so now , I have Hi jacked this thread.......Ill meet you at the track in  my 289 Hi performance , super sport /with the cobra kit, ,  4 on the floor, with 411 rear end and we will see which one is Breed Worthy

Dawg:  You can come along with the camera.......ought to be a lot more fun than throwing  words here on this stupid white sheet of paper.......and I get a kick out of    running all over    a MAN BEHIND THE WHEEL...........................

I will bring a long my 440 Magnum in tow, in case you want to rechallenge me on the win.......

See ya!      We will post the video when we get back...folks........

BTW::::::DALLAS COWBOYS ARE THE BEST IN THE USA 

     POOR  CHEESEHEADS>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


by Do right and fear no one on 01 December 2007 - 22:12

hmmmm

So animules.  YOur opinion is that Hillary Clinton should not be Commander in Chief of the armed forces as she has never been in the armed forces?

You feel that someone who has never actually played basketball, should attempt to coach it?  Should I name a few of them that didn;t and have won championships?

I could go on and on about this, but I will leave you with a quote  or two from someone much smarter than me:

"Animals chosen for exhibition sports are not the same as their actual "job" counterparts. An animal, of any breed, doing  well at a trial or rodeo event is not necessarily a representation of the breed's acumen in the actual field of work. It is more the handler's acumen in picking and training an animal for a specific, brief "snapshot" of the larger job."

"We agree that tests are not representative of the working counterparts."

AND, I could not agree more.  You said it much better than I ever could, A-dog.






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top