A CONFORMATION TEST in GSD WORKING TRIALS - REQUIRED - Page 25

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Videx

by Videx on 24 January 2009 - 01:01

My conclusion: The SV must use their authority and powerful influence, directly through the SV and the WUSV to introduce the necessary changes in Working Trials Rules & Regulations, to bring about substantial improvements in the conformation of the GSD Working Dogs. Current and recent V graded GSD Working Dogs illustrate what is achievable and desirable.

The SV must continue their efforts to substantially improve the Working ability amongst the Show line GSD, recognising that improved conformation of the GSD Working dogs will offer much more opportunities for their use in the breeding of our Show GSD.

I applaud the recognition of the GSD at the Sieger Shows 2007 and 2008, who were outstanding in their Schutzdienst. Perhaps a similar recognition for outstanding conformation could be made at the BSP.

Mystere

by Mystere on 24 January 2009 - 01:01

Nah!  The breeder would probably only breed the damn thing!! I'd spay/neuter it and put it in a nice pet home.  Maybe with a little old lady, 'cause avoiders are often fear-biters, too.  Fear-biters make good watch dogs, because they will bark up a storm and get really crazy, due to weak nerves.  They make a lot of noise, so an old lady would have time to call the cops, get out the back door, etc.   When cornered, they will bite (so will a hamster!!).  So, it could be protection in a pinch...maybe. 

Slamdunc

by Slamdunc on 24 January 2009 - 01:01

Crickets all I hear are crickets......what happened to Videx, after all he started this thread.  

Jim

animules

by animules on 24 January 2009 - 01:01

My conclusions: 
  • People shouldn't bash others when they themselves breeding dogs less then a year old. 
  • People shouldn't bash others and demand they follow SV rules when they do not themselves.
  • People should make sure their own dogs pass SV confirmation before demanding others do the same. 


Mystere

by Mystere on 24 January 2009 - 01:01

Jim. 



I hear those crickets, too!  Tends to happen with avoidance issues.

by Jeff Oehlsen on 24 January 2009 - 01:01

 WOW you guys went nuts on this thread.

Slamdunc

by Slamdunc on 24 January 2009 - 02:01

Hmmm Videx, a slight change of tune from the earlier posts.....

Jim


by Bob McKown on 24 January 2009 - 02:01


 If videx were one of my dogs and showed this much avoidence and lack of abality to learn or comprehend, neutering and a pet home would be his future...but a good pet home . 

missbeeb

by missbeeb on 24 January 2009 - 09:01


Aristian, go to school, this is a thread for grown ups!  All you do is COPY what others have said before you, there's not an original word in your posts... unless we look at your foul language in "User Comments"... where we can also see an example of your "knowledge" re: working / show lines!

I'm glad you've had your bitch spayed... after her mauling by a Pitbull?  Surprised you didn't ask PDB if you had to take her to a Vet to have it done!

Go away!

by Jeff Oehlsen on 24 January 2009 - 10:01

 OK. missbeeb. WTF is that dog looking at ??? Is it a hand puppet ??? THis thread became so dull, that I had time to look at your avatar. LOL





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top