A CONFORMATION TEST in GSD WORKING TRIALS - REQUIRED - Page 3

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

snajper69

by snajper69 on 22 January 2009 - 14:01

This is where my point comes out, dogs that can't do the work, mimimum full SCH rutine before the conformation (not 5 or 6 years ego) should not be allowed to participate. GSD is a working dog first, than comes conformation, nothing wrong with haveing good working dog that looks good at the same time, but over angulation as presented in many showline dogs should be not allowed.

snajper69

by snajper69 on 22 January 2009 - 14:01

And nothing wrong with working people come out with the working test. Working test should be diverse enough to assure that GSD can perform in any kind of work, no excuses, no pain no glory :) 

by Gustav on 22 January 2009 - 14:01

Videx, I have no problem with the concept "if", the conformation criteria that is utilized is the conformation criteria that was used WHEN show and working dogs were the same dog. Many working people feel strongly that current show structure is incapable of high work standards. I'm not going to go there, but I do believe that it stands to reason that when TOP show dogs were TOP working dog producers, is the last time we had it RIGHT on either account. Soooo lets agree that the conformation standard should reflect the structure of Bernd, Marko, Mutz, Held v Ritterberg, and the other dogs of that period that were TOP conformation dogs and produced top working dogs. This is reality in terms of show vs working as these types did both....these latter day dogs have not demonstrated that the structure that is approved today is capable of "producing" working dogs in either sport or working. The concept is good....the application must be based on what is proven.

snajper69

by snajper69 on 22 January 2009 - 14:01

I am with Gustav on that one. We should go back to the time when the dog's could work and conform at the same time. Overangulation should not be allowed. GSD should be a dog that is capable of working, being perfect companion, and a good representaion of the breed all at the same time.

Videx

by Videx on 22 January 2009 - 14:01

 reason and others with similar comments. You appear to forget the GSD at the Sieger Show - Working Class ALL have Schutzhund qualifications. 
THEY STILL HAVE TO PASS THE SCHUTZDIENST TO COMPETE IN THE WORKING CLASS.

ALL GSD in GSD National & International Working Trials should be scored on their conformation, and ALL SHOULD STILL COMPETE

I have NOT suggested any reduction in the working ability - I have simply and seriously suggested an improvement in their conformation standard.

IT WILL DEFINITELY COME

It is on my website in 20 LANGUAGES

 

LOOK HERE: http://www.videxgsd.com/conformation_grade_TRIALS.htm

 

Use Google Translate on the webpage


Videx

by Videx on 22 January 2009 - 15:01

Gustav: Our GSD Breed can and must work together. United in common aims, we are at our strongest. I am certain that when my proposal in introduced it will open a valuable and powerful determination to achieve and maintain the "THE IDEAL GSD" - I am certain the Working side of the GSD will have much to offer, both in conformation and working ability. I fail to see any valid reason for those involved with the Working GSD to reject improvements in their conformation, and at the same time, I fail to see any valid reason for those involved with the Show GSD to reject improvements in their working ability. I REST MY CASE - GAME, SET & MATCH. or CHECK MATE!

by reason on 22 January 2009 - 15:01

Videx

Am glad we agree as that is my point exactly the work dogs have also undergone the SAME survey

snajper69

by snajper69 on 22 January 2009 - 15:01

"You appear to forget the GSD at the Sieger Show - Working Class ALL have Schutzhund qualifications" sure they do. Requirment to compete in working trial on national level would eliminate all the one that got their classification in questionable manner as well assure that they are the top of the crop. After all VA title should be awarded to only top dogs in the world.  I am advocating this requirment only for dog's that will strive for the "VA"  and be the true represantation of the breed standards.

Videx

by Videx on 22 January 2009 - 15:01

snaiper69: please concentrate on the Working GSD, and cease making unfounded allegations. speculation and hearsay are not facts. We do not need the "lynch mob" or the "kangaroo court" mentality on this debate. 

snajper69

by snajper69 on 22 January 2009 - 15:01

This is a "public detabase", weather you agree or disagree with other people "mentality" it's your problem no one else. Can't deal with it, press the x on the top of your window, it should solve your issues. lol





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top