Chequers BAGSD show - Page 4

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by leiasmum on 30 June 2011 - 16:06

Still nobody answers my questions!!!

Whatever the problem with the Suzzanne Syers or another rescue, there has been allegations made about this rescue that chequers support. Why cant anybody expand on that?

by yorkjason on 30 June 2011 - 17:06

Leiasmum.  Nobody answered my questions I asked on page 1 either so join the club !.

by charlesppope on 30 June 2011 - 19:06

To leiasmum. I've asked you to ring me. I'd expand on it all you like if you'd rang but you never:(

Abby Normal

by Abby Normal on 30 June 2011 - 19:06

Well, it seems this is a personal vendetta, and as always somehow, somewhere it will be the dogs that need rescuing that suffer.

I really don't care about the politics, rescue centres are not immune from it sadly.    If two rescue centres smear each other, (if that part is true Paul, it seemed to suddenly be thrown in) how does that help the dogs that they rehome and the work they do.

I have no experience of UK GSD Rescue (though I wonder why they chose a name so similar to GSD Rescue UK !)  One thing worried me, Paul said:

and (the dogs) are sometimes neutered & spayed......
IMO every rescue centre should spay and neuter dogs for rehoming except in exceptional circumstances, usually age related.

I agree that a rescue centre should be worthy of support. However, so far, apart from a historic benefit cheat article, there has been nothing to support any of your other claims. If there is evidence of what you claim about the dogs Charles, then let's have it, not insinuations - facts.  (BTW Spay/neuter contracts are virtually unenforceable for any rescue).  You have pm'd Leiasmum, but apparently even in a pm you have nothing to offer to support your accusations. As for asking someone to ring you!  You started this - publicly - if you are not prepared to back up your statements - publicly - then how can you expect anyone to take it seriously? 

by PaulGSD2 on 30 June 2011 - 20:06

When the name was chosen no other rescue was using the name German shepherd rescue UK, this rescue was dissolved in 2008. Since the rescue started using the name UK German shepherd rescue another rescue started using the name again but only in Google searches as this is not their trading name, they have since purchased the company name UK German shepherd rescue and now also use that name in there Google searches and just to add more confusion they have also purchased the domain ukgermanshepherdrescue.com yet people say we copied to mislead people. I beg to differ.

With regards to Suzanne, does her flawless work in rescue not outweigh her mistake, If everybody had to wear a label for something they did wrong the high street would become so much for interesting. This world is far from perfect.


by leiasmum on 30 June 2011 - 21:06

GSDR do not vaccinate, or spay or flea or worm treat.
Donations range from £125 - 250.
What for!!!!


I will call you Charles , but it will be tomorrow, little bit late now.

by leiasmum on 30 June 2011 - 21:06

Charles you gave me Kay Waddingtons number I think.

by CERtain on 30 June 2011 - 21:06

So now this is a post about which rescue is best. How about instead of arguing ignore the fool who started this, they don't have a genuine reason for posting anyway.

Paul you were doing so well until you had to bring your own obvious personal feelings about GSDR into this; it was not needed, now you just look petty minded, you should have quit whilst you were ahead.


by leiasmum on 30 June 2011 - 22:06

I want to know more about the dogs that this woman has rehomed, without assessments, then letting them be bred from. This concerns me alot!


by PaulGSD2 on 30 June 2011 - 22:06

CERtain: All this originated from the GSDR to whom I never mentioned there name, just the other rescue. Seems everybody on here is aware of these issues anyway. The general public care only about the dogs and don't pick at the edges, they support the work of either rescue and smile when dogs get homes. This type of thread is only posted to force the rescue to defend itself from the myths lies and speculation that is put into idiots minds. We have seen all this before. We have made the effort and tried to resolved this issues so both rescues can work along side each other, we was turned down and told not to play rescue anymore. All the rescue wants to do is help dogs, yet we get post like these on forums & Facebook groups. Last week I had emails about a dog that was going to be shot, only after three hours of searching for a secure place to be told it was a fake on a FB group, this week its text messages. Why? How does help dogs? And why do simple minded idiots like Charles get taken in by propaganda so easy.

I would like Charles to provide the names and dates of the dogs that he claims went straight from the pound into a home plus the name of the rescue dog that was bred from etc. 





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top