This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Jenni78 on 29 April 2012 - 14:04
I agree, but I still feel that while a breeder SHOULDN'T be held responsible for any kind of abuse, the fact remains that if the dog ends up in a horrible home for any reason- blatant deception, negligence, or an honest mistake in character judging- it is STILL the responsibility of the breeder to make sure that dog is safe, whether it is fair or not. It's the same mentality that got me one of my current Pit Bulls. I bought the dog to keep it from going back to where it was headed. It's different than when my son throws a tantrum, breaks his toys, and then expects me to replace them. LOL
Dogs are total innocents and need to be protected. Maybe I'm overly emotional about it lately. That's just how I feel. It's not necessarily logical, but it feels right.
by Blitzen on 29 April 2012 - 14:04
by joanro on 29 April 2012 - 14:04
by magdalenasins on 29 April 2012 - 14:04
by Jenni78 on 29 April 2012 - 15:04
by Blitzen on 29 April 2012 - 19:04
Well, Jenni, if one is going to accuse someone of abusing a dog , then maybe one should have proof of that?
by isachev on 29 April 2012 - 20:04
by Jenni78 on 29 April 2012 - 22:04
by Red Sable on 29 April 2012 - 22:04
If you want them to spend money on the dog to make it more comfortable, give them their refund so they have the funds to do so.
by mollyandjack on 29 April 2012 - 22:04
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top